Timeline for When it is and is not acceptable to edit someone else's post
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2020 at 7:39 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing Mod | @HighlyRadioactive Please don’t. You may agree with this answer, but (as of writing) more people disagree than agree. Please follow the rule listed in the question: „Rules here take effect if they have at least 5 upvotes and have at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes" | |
| Aug 12, 2020 at 9:51 | history | edited | AviFS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2020 at 8:29 | comment | added | TwilightSparkle | Have my upvote. (I'm going to add explanation for every unexplained answer I see from now on.) | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:03 | history | edited | Community Bot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 12, 2020 at 2:09 | comment | added | AviFS | Does that mean I at least have your agreement? I'm too lazy to make the separate post for that flavor of languages right now, but if you're up to it please go ahead! Would recommend including a link to 05AB1E's command table to show that in such SBCS languages, it can almost always be unambiguously decoded with little to no prior knowledge, contrary to what the other person said. And it makes life infinitely easier! | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 1:51 | comment | added | AviFS |
Getting a lot of downvotes! Any of you agree for at least commenting terse SBCS languages like 05AB1E and Golfscript? There's no ambiguity in T = Push 10, it's pasted straight from the 05AB1E documentation, and it's actually readable!
|
|
| Apr 11, 2020 at 16:16 | history | answered | AviFS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |