Distribution and biology of the colossal squid, Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni: New data from depredation in toothfish fisheries and sperm whale stomach contents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.201904008 Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The maximum abundance of colossal squid occurs in the Cooperation Sea and the lowest in the Ross Sea.
  • Spawning likely occurs in summer; ovulation is synchronous and mature egg size is ∼3 mm.
  • The colossal squid feed primarily on mesopelagic fish, neither cephalopod not krill found in stomachs.

Abstract

We provide new insights into the biology and distribution of the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni), by analysing historical data collected during the commercial whaling years (1967–1974) together with recent information collated by CCAMLR observers in 2012–2017. The maximum abundance of colossal squid has been observed in the Indian Ocean sector of the Antarctic (Cooperation Sea), and the lowest in the Ross Sea (the area of highest abundance of its predator and competitor, the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni ). The colossal squid appears to feed primarily on mesopelagic fish. Spawning likely occurs in summer; ovulation is synchronous and mature egg size is ∼3 mm. Adult (large and maturing) M. hamiltoni are the most abundant in sperm whale diets at surface temperatures of −0.9 to 0 °C, which may indicate the locations of spawning grounds.

Introduction

The colossal squid Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni (Robson, 1925) is the largest living invertebrate, and one of the largest cephalopods ever to live on the planet (Vermeij, 2016). It attains dorsal mantle lengths of ∼250 cm, and a maximum recorded total weight of 495 kg (Jereb and Roper, 2010). It is an important element of the Antarctic ecosystem, occurring in waters between the Sub-Antarctic Front and Antarctic continent (Rosa et al., 2017). In this region, M. hamiltoni has been reported mixed with Antarctic toothfish in the stomach contents of cetaceans, suggesting that these two prey species co-occur in the same habitat (Yukhov, 2013) and represent the dominant toppredators across the 1000–2000 m depth range. This co-occurrence leads to intensive trophic interactions between these two species: the colossal squid and toothfish occasionally prey on each other as adults. Antarctic toothfish likely attack dead and dying colossal squid, whereas the squid prey on toothfish captured by commercial longlines (as well as possibly on weakened and dying individuals; Remeslo et al., 2015). Sperm whales in Antarctic waters appear to be the only major predators of healthy, full-grown M. hamiltoni, consuming around 9 million tons of this squid per year (allowing tentative stock estimates of 45–60 million tons; Nesis, 1985). Because of their potential commercial importance, data on M. hamiltoni distribution and biology (feeding, reproduction) were collected through intensive studies during the whaling era, as its potential as a food and/or pharmaceutical resource was considered. A range of Ukrainian studies, dedicated to exploring the commercial potential of both giant and colossal squids, were partially published in grey literature (Yukhov, 2012, 2013, 2014). Fishing gear targeting colossal squid was also developed but never deployed in practice (Yukhov, 2013).
Captures of juvenile colossal squids, which inhabit surface waters down to 500 m, are reasonably common (see review in Rosa et al., 2017), whereas adults are generally too large to be caught by trawl. Only one known report of a large trawl-caught M. hamiltoni individual exists, in 1981 by RV "Evrika" (Fig. 1 – Remeslo et al., 2015); most information about adults' distribution and biology has instead been inferred from sperm whale stomach contents. The cessation of commercial whaling and inability to collect any meaningful information about colossal squid from any of the modern routinely deployed scientific and fishing gears have considerably hindered the progress of knowledge about this species. However, complex interactions between M. hamiltoni and the Antarctic toothfish can provide some further insight into the squid's distribution and abundance, both from its occurrence in toothfish stomachs, and from the frequency of colossal squid attacks on captured toothfish.
To expand our knowledge of the colossal squid's biology, we analysed diverse historical data collected during the commercial whaling years (1967–1974) and published in Ukrainian grey literature (Yukhov, 2012, 2013, 2014) together with newer information collated by CCAMLR observers in 2012–2017. In addition, the reproductive systems of two large females captured by a New Zealand longliner in 2007 and 2013 were opportunistically examined, providing some insight into the species' fecundity and reproduction.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Observations on colossal squid depredation on toothfish were collected on board eight vessels (FVs "Greenstar", "Sunstar", "Kingstar", "Marigolds", "Hongjin 701", "Jung Woo No 2", "Simeiz" and "Calipso") targeting Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) around the Antarctic continent during the high fishing season (December–April) in the years 2012–2017. A total of 782 fishing lines were observed and 19,290 toothfish checked for the presence/absence of external evidence indicating predation

Spatial intensity of observed colossal squid attacks and toothfish predation on the squid

Among a total of 822 observed lines, about 13% (N = 108) showed evidence of predation by colossal squid (Fig. 4). In total, approximately one of every hundred captured toothfish (216 of 19,890) was attacked.
The highest occurrence of colossal squid attacks on hauled Antarctic toothfish, both in terms of percentage of affected hauls and percentage of damaged fish, was observed in the southern Cooperation Sea (CCAMLR Subdivision 58.4.2). Around 30% of the observed lines there were affected by

Discussion

Observed depredation rates by the colossal squid in fisheries for the Antarctic toothfish (D. mawsoni) are lower than those by marine mammals in fisheries targeting its sister species, the Patagonian toothfish (D. eleginoides). In the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Crozet Is., longliners’ catches were found to be reduced on average by 22.5% in the presence of orca, 12.1% by sperm whales, and 42.5% when both species were present together (Roche et al., 2007). Cetacean attacks are also much

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the scientific observers who collected data on the occurrence of colossal squid attacks on the fished Antarctic toothfish: S. Burykin, V. Shnar, A. Vafiev and M. Yakushev (AtlantNIRO, Kaliningrad) and Judith Brown (Falkland Islands Government Fisheries Department, Stanley) who provided similar information for the Patagonian toothfish fisheries. We are grateful also to Dr. N.N. Gorbunova (Shirshov's Institute of Oceanology, Moscow) who investigated the colossal squid

References (25)

  • K.S. Bolstad et al.

    A mitochondrial phylogeny of the family Onychoteuthidae (Cephalopoda: oegopsida)

    Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.

    (2018)
  • K.R. Arrigo et al.

    Primary production in the Southern Ocean, 1997–2006

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2008)
  • M.R. Clarke

    A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks

    (1986)
  • G. Duhamel et al.

    Chapter 7. Biogeographic patterns of the fish

  • Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of cephalopod species known to date

  • V. Laptikhovsky et al.

    The reproductive features of a mature female of the deep-sea planktonic squid Galiteuthis glacialis (Cephalopoda: Cranchiidae) from the Southern Ocean

    Polar Res.

    (2003)
  • V. Laptikhovsky et al.

    First case of possible iteroparity among coleoid cephalopods: the giant warty squid Kondakovia longimana

    J. Molluscan Stud.

    (2013)
  • V. Laptikhovsky et al.

    A short guide to the identification of fish, cephalopod and marine mammal depredation marks on Patagonian and Antarctic toothfish in the Southern Ocean longline fisheries

  • B.J. Muus

    Development and distribution of a North Atlantic pelagic squid, family Cranchiidae

    Meddel. Danmarks. Fisker. Havunders. Ny ser

    (1956)
  • K.N. Nesis

    Oceanic Cephalopod Molluscs: Distribution, Life Forms, and Evolution

    (1985)
  • A.V. Remeslo et al.

    Alien vs. Predator: interactions between the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) and the Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni)

    J. Nat. Hist.

    (2015)
  • J. Roberts et al.

    The diet of toothfish species Dissostichus eleginoides and Dissostichus mawsoni with overlapping distributions

    J. Fish Biol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Studying the swift, smart, and shy: Unobtrusive camera-platforms for observing large deep-sea squid

      2021, Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, there is a need to develop reliable methods for recording these elusive species in their natural habitats (Roper and Shea 2013; Guerra et al., 2018). Moreover, many large deep-sea cephalopods, such as the giant squid Architeuthis dux and the colossal squid Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni, are ecologically important deep-sea predators (Cherel et al., 2009), serve as prey for deep-diving cetaceans (Judkins et al., 2015), and have extensive geographic ranges (Coro et al., 2015; Remeslo et al., 2019). Knowledge of the behaviour, distribution, and abundance of these species is therefore a key component to understanding deep-sea ecosystems (Hoving et al., 2014).

    View full text
    © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.