Value of urban views in a bay city: Hedonic analysis with the spatial multilevel additive regression (SMAR) model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.201602008 Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Non-linear effects of open view, ocean view, and green view, are estimated.
  • The spatial multilevel additive model is applied for a hedonic analysis.
  • Not only poor green view, but also excessive green view has a negative impact.
  • How to evaluate 3D view to trees with remotely sensed data is demonstrated.

Abstract

This paper attempts to assess the value of urban views in a bay city (Yokohama), Japan. Firstly, three types of views, open view (goodness of visibility), green view (visibility of open space), and ocean view (visibility of ocean), were quantified employing the viewshed analysis implemented on the GIS with airborne LiDAR data and 0.5 m ×ばつ 0.5 m high resolution aerial photos. Secondly, hedonic analyses were conducted to test the capitalization of value of those views into condominium prices using the spatial multilevel additive regression (SMAR) model, where possible non-linearity, multilevel structure of condominiums (unit-building), and spatial dependence were considered. This study implies that "very nice" open view (in terms of the amount of visibility) and ocean view may have a positive premium, whereas "slightly nice" open and ocean views may not. Also, a "moderate amount" of green view may raise condominium prices, but "poor" and "too much" green view may reduce condominium prices. These results indicate that the effects of views are indeed non-linear, and therefore it may be misleading to interpret the results obtained by linear models as existing studies have done.

Introduction

According to Lynch (1960) in a pioneering study of urban landscape, urban environment is perceived through human eyes as an image. Hence "value of view" may be one of the very important factors which can raise the value of a city, although neither "view" nor "value of view" is easy to quantify. After the seminal work by Rosen (1974), the hedonic approach has enjoyed a great deal of success in empirical literature to assess the value of non-market goods. The value of views, including open view (goodness of visibility), water view (visibility of water body), green view (visibility of open space), and urban view (visibility of urban elements such as streets or buildings) has also been assessed by employing this approach, and the results are nicely summarized in Bourassa, Hoesli, and Sun (2004) and Jim and Chen (2009), except for recent studies, and in Yamagata, Murakami, and Seya (2015) with the most recent results.
In the existing literature, several approaches have been taken for visibility evaluation. Some earlier studies measured visibility using a dummy variable, which takes one if a focused object is visible and zero if it is not visible (e.g., Benson, Hansen, Schwartz, & Smersh, 1998; McLeod, 1984). Other studies evaluated visibility based on field investigations. For instance, Tyrvainen and Miettinen (2000) used a field investigation to obtain the visibility information from the window of a unit of a condominium, whereas Luttik (2000) extracted such information from maps, complemented by field investigations. Clearly, both the dummy variable approach and the field investigation approach have their own limitations. That is, the former approach may suffer from an underestimation of values of high quality views and an overestimation of values of low quality views (Behrer, 2010), because the "quality" of views is not considered in this approach. Also, the latter approach may suffer from huge implementation costs if the number of required samples is fairly large.
Recent studies have employed more sophisticated visibility evaluation approaches (Yamagata et al., 2015): the isovist analysis, which has been developed mainly in architectural and urban studies (Benedikt, 1979), and the viewshed analysis, which has been developed mainly in landscape studies (Lynch, 1976). Isovist is defined as "the set of all points visible from a given vantage point in space and with respect to an environment" (Benedikt, 1979). A conventional isovist analysis evaluates views in a two dimensional (2D) space, and therefore one of the limitations of the conventional isovist analysis is ignorance of the third dimension (i.e., height)—capturing only a 2D horizontal slice of human perception (Yu, Han, & Chai, 2007; Yang, Putra, & Li, 2007). Note that, recently, some extensions that cope with this problem have been proposed (e.g., Bhatia, Chalup, & Ostwald, 2013; Morello & Ratti, 2009). On the other hand, the viewshed analysis tries to quantify a three dimensional (3D) view by examining whether each cell in a 3D raster is visible or not from an observation point. In recent years, it has gradually become possible to obtain high-resolution 3D elevation maps such as digital surface maps (DSM) and/or digital terrain maps (DTM), thus the applicability of viewshed analysis has dramatically increased (Sander and Polasky, 2009, Yu et al., 2007). However, in Japan, no studies have been conducted to quantify the "value of view", especially in urban areas, except for our preliminary study (Yamagata, Murakami, Seya, & Tsutsumi, 2013). One of the seemingly obvious reasons for this is the difficulty in obtaining high-resolution DSM data, whereas the high-resolution (5 m) digital terrain model (DTM) is easily available through "Fundamental Geospatial Data" of the Geospatial Information Authority (GSI) of Japan (http://www.gsi.go.jp/kiban/). In this study, we solved this issue by utilizing airborne LiDAR data and 0.5 m ×ばつ 0.5 m high resolution aerial photos, which was provided by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan.
The objective of this study was as follows. In this study, we attempted to assess the value of urban views in Yokohama city, Japan. Firstly, three types of views, open view, green view, and ocean view, were quantified employing the viewshed analysis implemented on ArcGIS 10.1. Secondly, hedonic analyses were conducted to test the capitalization of value of those views into condominium prices registered from 1993 to 2008 using the spatial multilevel additive regression (SMAR) model, where possible non-linearity, multilevel structure of condominiums (unit-building), and spatial dependence were considered. This study is meaningful to encourage an effective urban landscape design with deeper understanding of the possibly non-linear influence of open views, green views, and ocean views.
The organization of this paper is as follows. Section 2 reviews previous hedonic analysis studies focusing on views employing the viewshed analysis. Section 3 describes our models for hedonic analysis. Section 4 introduces the data, followed by the empirical investigation examining the value of views, and Section 5 concludes this paper.

Section snippets

Literature review on hedonic analyses of views using the viewshed analysis

As mentioned in Section 1, the literature on hedonic analyses of views has utilized fairly manual methods to quantify views. Field investigation may provide an accurate estimation of views, but it is not easy to implement it in large scale like our city-scale case. However, it is now fairly easy to implement viewshed analysis using e.g., the ArcGIS of Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) if spatially fine DSM and/or DTM data are available. The 3D Analyst toolbox of the ArcGIS

Basic assumptions

Rosen (1974) showed that the pricing function of residence coincides with the upper envelope of the bid rent function describing the willingness of consumers to pay. He also demonstrated that, based on this coincidence, the economic values of the non-market goods, including urban views, can be quantified by estimating their impacts on the pricing function (see, e.g., Rosen (1974) and Epple (1987), for more detail).
A pricing function gives rise to a linear-regression form if goods are freely

Study area

Our study area was the seven central wards of Yokohama city (Naka, Nishi, Minami, Isogo, Hodogawa, Konan, and Tostuka wards), which is the second largest city in Japan with a population of over three million (Fig. 1). The study area is located less than thirty minutes south of the Tokyo central business district (CBD) by train.

Viewshed analysis

Visibility measures can be selected among the isovist-based (vector-based) indices, which quantify the volume of the visible space, and the viewshed-based (raster-based)

Concluding remarks

This paper attempted to assess the value of urban view in Yokohama city, Japan. Firstly, three types of views, "Open view", "Green view", and "Ocean view", were quantified employing the viewshed analysis implemented on ArcGIS with DSM/DTM, derived from airborne LiDAR data, and 0.5 m ×ばつ 0.5 m high resolution aerial photos. Secondly, hedonic analyses were conducted to test the capitalization of values of those views into condominium prices using the SMAR model, where possible non-linearity, multilevel

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, who provided us with the LiDAR data and aerial photos. We thank Dr. Simon Benger (Flinders University), Dr. Perry Yang (Georgia Institute of Technology), Dr. Morito Tsutsumi (University of Tsukuba), Dr. Masaki Mori (National University of Singapore), and Dr. Yuichiro Kawaguchi (Waseda University) for their scientific advice regarding this and other relevant studies. We also thank Drs. Hasi Bagan, Masatomo Hayashi, and Habura

References (66)

  • H. Seya et al.

    Automatic selection of a spatial weight matrix in spatial econometrics: application to a spatial hedonic approach

    Regional Science and Urban Economics

    (2013)
  • K. Shoyama et al.

    Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: a choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators

    Land Use Policy

    (2013)
  • L. Tyrvainen et al.

    Property prices and urban forest amenities

    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

    (2000)
  • Y. Yamagata et al.

    Simulating a future smart city: an integrated land use-energy model

    Applied Energy

    (2013)
  • S. Adachi et al.

    Moderation of summertime heat-island phenomena via modification of the urban form in the Tokyo metropolitan area

    Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    (2014)
  • L. Anselin

    Spatial econometrics

    Methods and models

    (1988)
  • L. Anselin et al.

    Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence in a single cross-section

    Papers in Regional Science

    (2013)
  • P. Behrer

    Building in the mountains: a hedonic analysis of the value of degraded mountain views using GIS modeling. Discussion paper 2010–15

    (2010)
  • M.L. Benedikt

    To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields

    Environment and Planning B

    (1979)
  • E.D. Benson et al.

    Pricing residential amenities: the value of a view

    Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

    (1998)
  • S. Bhatia et al.

    Wayfinding: a method for the empirical evaluation of structural saliency using 3D isovists

    Architectural Science Review

    (2013)
  • O. Bin et al.

    Viewscapes and flood hazard: coastal housing market response to amenities and risk

    Land Economics

    (2008)
  • S.C. Bourassa et al.

    What’s in a view?

    Environment and Planning A

    (2004)
  • W. Brunauer et al.

    Modelling house prices using multilevel structured additive regression

    Statistical Modelling

    (2013)
  • J. Cavailhès et al.

    GIS-based hedonic pricing of landscape

    Environmental and Resource Economics

    (2009)
  • S. Conroy et al.

    The value of a floor: valuing floor level in high-rise condominiums in San Diego

    International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis

    (2013)
  • L. Corrado et al.

    Where is the economics in spatial econometrics?

    Journal of Regional Science

    (2012)
  • M. Costanigro et al.

    Segmenting the wine market based on price: hedonic regression when different prices mean different products

    Journal of Agricultural Economics

    (2007)
  • G. Dong et al.

    Spatial autoregressive models for geographically hierarchical data structures

    Geographical Analysis

    (2015)
  • D. Fisher-Gewirtzman et al.

    Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    (2003)
  • S. Gibbons et al.

    Mostly pointless spatial econometrics?

    Journal of Regional Science

    (2012)
  • A. Grêt-Regamey et al.

    Predicting the scenic beauty value of mapped landscape changes in a mountainous region through the use of GIS

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    (2007)
  • Cited by (59)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text
    © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.