pp. 503-539
Decision Making in Using Assassinations in International Relations
Warner R. Schilling and JONATHAN L. SCHILLING analyze how leaders weigh the costs and benefits of using assassination to advance their foreign policy interests. They conclude that the decision-making process is prone to bias, especially when dependent on the identity of the likely successor.
The H-Bomb Decision: How to Decide without Actually Choosing, Warner R. Schilling
War and the Soviet Union: Nuclear Weapons and the Revolution in Soviet Military and Political Thinking, H. S. Dinerstein Reviewed by Warner R. Schilling
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Academy Forum | The 2024 Presidential and Congressional Elections: Small Wave, Seismic Effects
October 7, 2025
2:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m. ET
WEBINAR
Jimmy Carter's Legacy
Jimmy Carter's Public Policy Ex-Presidency
John Whiteclay Chambers II
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson
view additional issuesArticles |
Turkey in the World War, Ahmed Emin
Reviewed by Donald C. Blaisdell
Selling Fear: Counterterrorism, the Media, and Public Opinion, Brigitte L. Nacos, Yaeli Bloch-Elkon and Robert Y. Shapiro
Reviewed by Montague Kern
Why Parties? A Second Look, John H. Aldrich
Reviewed by Jeffrey M. Stonecash
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.