Archives
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
NetWare for OS/2
NetWare for OS/2 was one of the most technically interesting products of the mid-1990s. Novell’s NetWare was long established as a file server for LANs; since NetWare/386, Novell’s NOS ran as a dedicated server which was loaded from DOS but took over the entire system once started. But ever since the late 1980s, Novell was talking about a non-dedicated NetWare server running on top of OS/2.
In August 1993, Novell finally released NetWare for OS/2 as a 200ドル add-on to NetWare 4.01. With the add-on, NetWare 4.01 server could be installed on top of OS/2. A single OS/2 machine could function as an OS/2 application server, a NetWare server, and could also run the NetWare client at the same time.
NetWare for OS/2 was essentially a paravirtualization layer (even though the term did not yet exist at the time) for NetWare which largely replaced direct hardware access by functionality provided by OS/2. The NetWare server could still use its own network drivers, but disk access and memory management were handled by OS/2, and NetWare ran as a special task. NetWare for OS/2 could run the same NLMs (NetWare Loadable modules) which dedicated NetWare servers supported.
By the time NetWare 4.1 was released, NetWare for OS/2 was bundled into the standard server product and network administrators could either install the standard dedicated server launched from DOS or non-dedicated NetWare for OS/2. The latter was a bit of of an odd duck; it was unlikely to replace dedicated "lock in a closet and forget" NetWare servers for larger LANs, but was an interesting option for smaller offices where hardware consolidation was an important factor.
NetWare for OS/2 was also attractive for development purposes. It was the only way to host a development environment, as well as run the NetWare server and client on the same system. Likewise all NetWare remote administration tools could be run on the same machine, either in DOS or Win-OS/2 sessions.
Technical Overview
As with modern paravirtualized systems, NetWare for OS/2 was far more similar to the dedicated variant than it was different. When NetWare for OS/2 was displaying the server console in a full-screen OS/2 session, it was indistinguishable from dedicated NetWare at first glance.
NetWare for OS/2 was probably well over 95% identical to the dedicated variant. It used the same NLMs and ran mostly the same code. There were differences were in several areas. Memory management was handled by OS/2 and NetWare had an option to give back memory to OS/2. Disk access was handled entirely by OS/2, but worked on block device level, not file level. In fact the presence of the DSKSHARE.DSK module (OS/2 disk-sharing device driver) was one of the few signs that NetWare was running on top of OS/2.
In other words, where dedicated NetWare used a DOS FAT boot partition, NetWare for OS/2 used an OS/2 FAT or HPFS partition instead. NetWare required at least one separate partition which it accessed through OS/2 disk drivers but the filesystem was managed entirely by NetWare, just like on a dedicated NetWare server.
NetWare for OS/2 used its own network drivers, but could share network devices with the NetWare OS/2 client (requester) or even with IBM’s network stack.
As mentioned earlier, NetWare for OS/2 ran largely standard NetWare server code. There was a special OS/2 loader, NWOS2.EXE. This was an OS/2 console application which could run either in full screen or in a window on the OS/2 desktop.
Most of the magic was in PNETWARE.SYS and VNETWARE.SYS, a pair of OS/2 device drivers which implemented the paravirtualiation services. PNETWARE.SYS was a standard 16-bit OS/2 PDD (Physical Device Driver) which provided low-level services such as allocating GDT selectors. VNETWARE.SYS was, interestingly, a VDD (Virtual Device Driver); VDDs were designed to support DOS sessions in OS/2. Unlike PDDs, the VDDs in OS/2 were always 32-bit since compatibility with OS/2 1.x was not a concern.
Novell likely looked for a way to run some of their existing 32-bit code inside the OS/2 kernel and VDDs turned out to be the easiest path. This was an unusual solution, but clearly workable.
Virtualizing Paravirtualization
Can NetWare for OS/2 be installed in a virtual machine? Yes. NetWare 4.11 for OS/2 was successfully installed on top of Warp 3 and Warp 4 running in VirtualBox. In both cases, OS/2 was set up without networking support and the NetWare client plus server was installed from the NetWare 4.11 CD. Note that it is possible to install the NetWare server without the client.
The default AMD PCnet emulation was used. NetWare 4.11 ships with drivers (PCNTNW) for PCnet NICs, therefore no third-party drivers are needed. When configuring storage in the VM, it is important to leave unused space (at least a few hundred megabytes) for NetWare. Either the OS/2 partition must only take up part of the disk, or another virtual disk must be added for use by NetWare. On the whole, installation is very easy and requires minimum of input if the simple installation path is used.
Here it should be pointed out that NetWare for OS/2 has a nasty Y2K bug which messes up the system date if it’s past 1999 (NetWare 4.11 was released in 1996). NetWare appears to add 36 years to the system date, thought the effects may vary; in 2012, it sets the date to 2048. This affects both the NetWare server and OS/2. It also appears that if the NetWare server is restarted with the system date set to 2048, it will hang after a short while.
Novell released a patch for the issue in 1997; it is part of the NetWare Support Packs and available separately as 411Y2KP2.EXE. The VNETWARE.SYS file, normally located in C:\NETWARE on the OS/2 system, must be replaced. Note that the dedicated NetWare server does not have this particular issue, though there still are a few other, largely cosmetic Y2K bugs.
As mentioned earlier, with NetWare for OS/2 it was possible to run the remote administration tools, such as NetAdmin, on the same system as the server.
Since some of the NetWare administration were Windows based, it was advisable to use OS/2 Warp with Win-OS/2 as a base for NetWare for OS/2 (a moot point for OS/2 Warp 4 since all Warp 4 releases included Win-OS/2).
As a slightly pathological case, it was possible to run NetWare for OS/2 in a window on the OS/2 desktop and attach to it via RCONSOLE from a windowed DOS session. Both windows would then be displaying the same content, communicating via RSPX (remote SPX, Novell’s remote management protocol).
In NetWare 4.1, Novell reportedly added a fast path for the OS/2 client when it was running on the same system as the server; presumably a large part of the network stack was bypassed in that case.
The only management utility specific to NetWare for OS/2 was PMMON, a GUI load monitor showing processor utilization, number of connections, open files, etc.
NetWare for OS/2 did little for either NetWare or OS/2. In some ways it wasn’t playing to NetWare’s core strengths, and it was released at a time when NetWare was already losing market share to Windows-based networking. Typical OS/2 customers on the other hand might have wanted to use IBM’s LAN Server instead. Nevertheless, NetWare for OS/2 was a technically highly interesting product, a rare marriage of two very different operating systems.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Lewis G. Rosenthal for providing a lot of information about Novell NetWare in general as well as NetWare for OS/2 specifics.
Thanks to Jason Stevens for his input on NetWare and virtualization.
2 Responses to NetWare for OS/2
Sadly nearly everybody I knew was still using NetWare 3.x. Some migrated later to NW5.
It seems that for small networks, NW 4.x didn’t offer much over 3.x. The NDS concept was nice, but only truly useful for larger organizations. On top of that, Novell did a pretty good job patching up NetWare 3.11/3.12 and backporting newer disk/network drivers, which probably removed a big incentive to upgrade for many people.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.