Archives
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
How Apple Created Hackintosh, Part I
At a developer conference in June 2005, Apple announced that OS X will transition from PowerPC to Intel processors. The first Intel Macs (sometimes nicknamed “Mactels”) were introduced several months later, in January 2006. The announcement generated significant interest in the PC world, and everyone started wondering: Is OS X going to run on my PC? The then-current OS X 10.4 Tiger was in many ways superior to Windows XP, and while Windows ruled the business world, Macs were very strong in the media creation department.
Soon after the conference, Apple shipped custom development systems to interested parties who were willing to pay 999ドル for the privilege. The systems came with an Intel version of OS X 10.4.1 which refused to run on any standard PC, even though the Apple development systems were extremely close to a vanilla PC.
No later than August 2005 (still months before the official release), the first hacked versions of OS X Tiger for x86 appeared. This in turn spawned an entire strange subterranean cult of Hackintosh, populated largely by people whose time is worth very little and who put a lot of effort into creating an entirely untested and unsupported system.
But how did Hackintosh appear on the scene so quickly? The person most responsible for that was none other than Steve Jobs, and to understand why, we have to rewind another 20 years back.
In 1985, Steve Jobs left Apple (how much that was voluntary not is a matter of perspective). Later that year, Jobs founded NeXT (later NeXT Computer), a maker of hip workstations and a very unusual operating system called NeXTSTEP. Initially NeXTSTEP only supported NeXT’s own 68000-based workstation launched in 1988, the NeXTcube. In the early 1990s, NeXTSTEP was ported to SPARC, HP PA-RISC, and Intel’s x86 architecture.
While not an Apple product, NeXTSTEP was in many ways an embodiment of Apple’s “Think Different” mantra. The Mach microkernel was combined with much of BSD kernel and userland, with a very modern, object-oriented programming interface based on Objective-C (when NeXTSTEP was developed, C++ wasn’t mature; Apple also funded the addition of the Objective-C front end to GCC). NeXTSTEP became popular with developers because it enabled rapid development of complex software. Notable developed-on-NeXT software includes HTML/WWW and DOOM.
By about 1994, NeXTSTEP ran on many generic PCs. In 1995, NeXTSTEP turned into OpenStep, without much change in the underlying OS. In February 1997, Apple acquired NeXT (and Steve Jobs) due to a desperate need for an OS more modern than the classic Mac OS, which was rather similar to Windows 3.x in far too many ways.
Apple got to work and in 1997/1998, released developer versions of Rhapsody OS, essentially an Apple-ized NeXTSTEP. For many years, Rhapsody DR2 (Developer Release 2) from 1998 was the last Apple desktop OS which ran on x86.
By the time Rhapsody turned into OS X and was released first as Mac OS X Server 1.0 (1999) and Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah (2001), only PowerPC Macs were supported. Except not really. All through the early 2000s, Apple supported a mostly-open-source project called Darwin. This was essentially OS X without the Apple GUI and applications. And Darwin did support x86 all along—including AMD and VIA processors.
There are mythical stories about how one man ported OS X to PCs, but they’re just that, stories. The OS started as a cross-platform one (with last release in 1998, see above), and Apple maintained the x86 support in Darwin all along. The only mystery is why anyone would be surprised by Apple switching to Intel despite the rumors of Project Marklar going back to 2002 and the obvious evidence of Darwin x86 support which was right on Apple’s web site staring everyone in the eye.
As of November 2017, Apple still provides the last Darwin 8.0.1 bootable ISO if one knows where to look (and here are the release notes). This is a stripped down OS X 10.4 Tiger which runs on generic PCs (there’s a version for PowerPC Macs, too). Among other things, Darwin contains a BIOS boot loader which can start the xnu kernel from a HFS+ partition (and Apple provides the source code, too).
To recap, Darwin 8.0.1 in April 2005 was Apple’s last Darwin binary release. In early June 2005, on top of Darwin 8.1.0, Apple had this:
It is obvious that if Apple shipped the first Intel OS X release to developers in June 2005 and Intel Macs were released in January 2006, the Intel version of OS X was quite far along by the time anyone outside Apple saw it. Certainly it does not feel like a 1.0 release—the PowerPC edition of OS X had been in wide use for four years by then, the OS had internally been running on Intel for a while, and for the transition period, Apple provided Rosetta, a dynamic PowerPC to x86 application translator.
As mentioned at the beginning of this article, the developer version of OS X 10.4.1 (and 10.4.3 in the Fall of 2005) did not run on standard PCs, even though the DTS was 99% a standard PC. For the most part it was because Apple simply didn’t care about hardware that Apple didn’t ship, but there was an added “safety” to ensure that OS X wouldn’t run on non-Apple PCs. But of course the 99% part was crucial and that’s why it only took a few weeks for Hackintosh to show up. More about that in Part II.
10 Responses to How Apple Created Hackintosh, Part I
I remember following a tutorial to get OS X running inside VMWare. IIRC, it involved installing OS X inside PearPC, then booting that image in Workstation.
https://eternallybored.org/osxvmware.png
There was a liason between NeXT and IBM from 1988 to 1990. It resulted in ports of NextStep (not to confuse with NeXTSTEP) for IBM’s AIX/6000 and AIX PS/2 operating systems. NextStep is the same graphical environment and development system (including the Stepstone Objective-C compiler) without NeXT’s kernel and base operating system components. For more information see IBM announcement letters 290-072 (http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS290-072/) and 290-171 (http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/1/897/ENUS290-171/).
I should add that Darwin 0.1/0.3 which match OS X Server 1.0 and 1.2, that they were only provided in binary form for the PowerPC, actually could be compiled on Rhapsody DR2, and the resulting 5.5 kernel runs just fine. I have one VM with close to 6 months uptime.
Also see “The Mac Observer Interview with Jordan Hubbard” [1] where they discussed this (“We talked about the early development of Mac OS X derived from NeXT and even the earliest BSD origins.”)
[1] https://www.freebsdnews.com/2017/02/23/tmo-background-mode-interview-open-source-developer/
NeXT later had a similar arrangement with Sun, working on OpenStep for Solaris.
Darwin really is one of the weirdest operating systems on the planet, it’s such a mix of… well, everything. But in many ways I think it’s the nicest desktop Unix out there, and most Mac users probably have no idea!
Interestingly, Darwin/x86 (pre-2005) used call gates: https://opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-391/i386/sys/SYS.h.auto.html
Call gates are hard to support on x86-64 due to them not disabling interrupts, and Solaris used a hack using #NP to support them. When x86-64 with SYSCALL/SWAPGS was being developed, AMD was mostly focused on Linux that did not use them. (OS X now uses SYSENTER/INT on 32-bit)
A very special flower indeed, that was nicely put in the interview.
I can’t but wonder if the departure of the likes of Jordan Hubbard and Bertrand Serlet from Apple is directly related to the deteriorating quality of OS X/macOS.
>I should add that Darwin 0.1/0.3 which match OS X Server 1.0 and 1.2, that they were only provided in binary form for the PowerPC, actually could be compiled on Rhapsody DR2, and the resulting 5.5 kernel runs just fine. I have one VM with close to 6 months uptime.
Continuous uptime, continuous-except-for-host-machine-reboots uptime, or total uptime?
@Sean McDonough continuous. I haven’t rebooted either in months.
~ # uptime
15:41:02 up 146 days, 10:05:17, load average: 0.17, 0.16, 0.15
[darwin:~] root# uptime
7:31AM up 146 days, 9:59, 2 users, load averages: 0.72, 0.80, 0.82
[darwin:~] root# hostinfo
Mach kernel version:
Kernel Release 5.5:
Sun Apr 30 10:53:53 SGT 2017; root(rcbuilder):kernel-7/BUILD/RELEASE_I386
Copyright (c) 1988-1995,1997-1999 Apple Computer, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Kernel configured for a single processor only.
1 processor is physically available.
Processor type: pentium (Intel Pentium)
Processor active: 0
Primary memory available: 512.00 megabytes.
Default processor set: 32 tasks, 56 threads, 1 processors
Load average: 0.89, Mach factor: 0.13
If this formats correctly… the first one is the ESX host, the second is the VM.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.