- Correspondence
- Published:
Long history of IAM comparisons
- Steven J. Smith 1 ,
- Leon E. Clarke 1 ,
- James A Edmonds 1 ,
- Jiang Kejun 2 ,
- Elmar Kriegler 3 ,
- Toshihiko Masui 4 ,
- Keywan Riahi 5 ,
- Priyadarshi R. Shukla 6 ,
- Massimo Tavoni 7 ,
- Detlef P. van Vuuren 8,9 &
- ...
- John P. Weyant 10
Nature Climate Change volume 5, page 391 (2015)Cite this article
-
2517 Accesses
-
11 Citations
-
7 Altmetric
Subjects
To the Editor —
We agree with the point made in a recent Editorial in this journal1 that the assumptions behind models of all types, including integrated assessment models (IAMs), should be as transparent as possible. However, it is incorrect to imply that the IAM community is just "now emulating the efforts of climate researchers by instigating their own model inter-comparison projects."
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Identifying energy model fingerprints in mitigation scenarios
- Mark M. Dekker
- , Vassilis Daioglou
- … Detlef van Vuuren
Nature Energy Open Access 06 November 2023
-
Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
- Charlie Wilson
- , Céline Guivarch
- … Erica L. Thompson
Climatic Change Open Access 04 May 2021
Access options
Subscription info for Japanese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go to natureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Nature Clim. Change 5, 81 10.1038/nclimate2526 (2015).
Understanding Climatic Change Appendix B (National Academy of Sciences, 1975).
Gates, W. L. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 29–55 (1999).
Covey, C. et al. Clim. Dynam. 16, 775–787 (2000).
EMF Working Group Energy and the Economy: EMf Report 1 (Stanford Univ., 1977).
Gaskins, D. W. Jr & Weyant, J. P. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 318–323 (1993).
Kriegler, E. et al. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24–44 (2015).
Calvin, K. L. et al. Energy Econ. 34 (suppl. 3), S251–S260 (2012).
Edenhofer, O. et al. Energy J. 31 (special issue), 11–48 (2010).
Luderer, G. et al. Climatic Change 114, 9–37 (2012).
Clarke L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, S., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J. et al. Long history of IAM comparisons. Nature Clim Change 5, 391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2576
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2576
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
-
Identifying energy model fingerprints in mitigation scenarios
- Mark M. Dekker
- Vassilis Daioglou
- Detlef van Vuuren
Nature Energy (2023)
-
The Model Dimensionality and Its Impacts on the Strategic and Policy Outcomes in IAMs the Findings from the RICE2020 Model
- Zili Yang
Computational Economics (2023)
-
Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
- Charlie Wilson
- Céline Guivarch
- Erica L. Thompson
Climatic Change (2021)
-
Interpreting energy scenarios
- Gokul Iyer
- James Edmonds
Nature Energy (2018)
-
Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models
- Stefan Pauliuk
- Anders Arvesen
- Edgar G. Hertwich
Nature Climate Change (2017)