RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
ginal Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values I shudder to think about what the higher-ups will say about the cost of faster storage. Th
Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
nt: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > > I can elaborate a little on what our *planned* approach for utilizing > SQL > Server is. I don't know if this will work, but I've done
RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
ycutt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values I can elaborate a little on what our *planned* approach for utilizing SQL Server is. I don't know if this will work, but
Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
1 600 > Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 12 November 2009 13:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > > Yea
RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
rd Analytica http://www.oxan.com -Original Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 November 2009 13:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Yeah, it is sort of like your standard faceting scenario
Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
unding for each corresponding organization? > > Michael > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wed 11/11/2009 10:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values > &g
RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
Message- From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wed 11/11/2009 10:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Well, let me prefix what I'm about to describe by saying that I know that I'm doing something with L
Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
Well, let me prefix what I'm about to describe by saying that I know that I'm doing something with Lucene that it wasn't meant to do. This is for a "proof of concept" system that I'm helping put together on a tight schedule with very limited resources, and we're trying to get to a mostly-working s
RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values
Matt, StringIndex is for use when a field has only one value in it for the purposes of sorting results, not for tokenized fields with multiple values. TermVectors might be a better approach, but for 50K docs, you'll encounter an IO hit on reading them. I'm curious why you are looking to grab all