lucene-net-user

Messages by Thread

• synonyms Artem Chereisky
  • RE: synonyms Michael Garski
  • Re: synonyms Artem Chereisky
• How to Distribute Lucene Index? Li Bing
  • Re: How to Distribute Lucene Index? Shashi Kant
• What About the Performance When Retrieving at Indexing? Li Bing
  • RE: What About the Performance When Retrieving at Indexing? Digy
  • Re: What About the Performance When Retrieving at Indexing? Li Bing
  • Re: What About the Performance When Retrieving at Indexing? Shashi Kant
  • RE: What About the Performance When Retrieving at Indexing? Digy
• How To Append and Synchronize Lucene Index? Li Bing
  • Re: How To Append and Synchronize Lucene Index? Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: How To Append and Synchronize Lucene Index? Digy
• Query For Unpopulated Fields Jerry Camel
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Jerry Camel
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Shashi Kant
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Jerry Camel
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Michael Garski
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Jerry Camel
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Michael Garski
  • Re: Query For Unpopulated Fields Shashi Kant
• [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer George Aroush
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Heath Aldrich
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Sean Carpenter
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Artem Chereisky
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Laimonas Simutis
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Dmitri Moore
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Matt Honeycutt
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Erik Hatcher
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer David Gao
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Kuhn-Kuester, Christian
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Ben Martz
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Michael Mitiaguin
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Mitica Guraliuc
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Halis SARITAŞ
  • AW: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Markus Wolters
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer zoolette
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Hugh Spiller
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Noel Lysaght
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Nitin Shiralkar
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Ciaran Roarty
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Franklin Simmons
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Digy
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Enrique Martínez Zuñiga
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Robert Pohl
  • Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Gregory Bell
  • RE: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer Narendra Tumkur
• idf on per-field basis Artem Chereisky
  • RE: idf on per-field basis Michael Garski
  • Re: idf on per-field basis Artem Chereisky
  • RE: idf on per-field basis Michael Garski
  • Re: idf on per-field basis Artem Chereisky
  • RE: idf on per-field basis Michael Garski
  • RE: idf on per-field basis Moray McConnachie
• System.TypeInitializationException on linux (vbnc) Johannes Drachenfels
  • Re: System.TypeInitializationException on linux (vbnc) Robert Jordan
  • AW: Re: System.TypeInitializationException on linux (vbnc) Johannes Drachenfels
• Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Markus Wolters
  • Re: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? [email protected]
  • AW: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Markus Wolters
  • RE: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Michael Garski
  • AW: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Markus Wolters
  • RE: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? George Aroush
  • AW: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Markus Wolters
  • RE: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Michael Garski
  • AW: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Markus Wolters
  • RE: Safe to use Release 2.9.1 Beta for production? Michael Garski
  • Spatial search with Lucene.Net Markus Wolters
  • RE: Spatial search with Lucene.Net Michael Garski
  • RE: Spatial search with Lucene.Net George Aroush
  • AW: Spatial search with Lucene.Net Markus Wolters
• How to search number in text field? Floyd Wu
  • RE: How to search number in text field? Michael Garski
  • Re: How to search number in text field? Floyd Wu
  • RE: How to search number in text field? Michael Garski
  • Re: How to search number in text field? Floyd Wu
  • Equiv. to where in(ids) Robert Pohl
  • RE: Equiv. to where in(ids) Michael Garski
  • Re: Equiv. to where in(ids) Robert Pohl
• [ask] index out of range exceptions. Marcelino Ponty
  • Re: [ask] index out of range exceptions. Michael Garski
  • Re: [ask] index out of range exceptions. Marcelino Ponty
  • RE: [ask] index out of range exceptions. Michael Garski
  • Re: [ask] index out of range exceptions. Marcelino Ponty
• IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • RE: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Michael Garski
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Matt Honeycutt
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • RE: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Michael Garski
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • RE: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Michael Garski
  • Re: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Eran Sevi
  • RE: IndexWriter is slow when reader is open Michael Garski
• FieldLookup for field with multiple values Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Michael Garski
  • Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Michael Garski
  • Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Moray McConnachie
  • Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Michael Garski
  • Re: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Matt Honeycutt
  • RE: FieldLookup for field with multiple values Michael Garski
• 2.9 Target Framework Michael Garski
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework Digy
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework George Aroush
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework Michael Garski
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
  • RE: 2.9 Target Framework George Aroush
  • Does QueryParser Require Upper Case Operators T. R. Halvorson
  • RE: Does QueryParser Require Upper Case Operators Digy
• Category count. André Maldonado
  • RE: Category count. Moray McConnachie
  • Re: Category count. Erik Hatcher
  • Re: Category count. André Maldonado
  • Re: Category count. Matt Honeycutt
  • Re: Category count. Erik Hatcher
• Re: Multi-valued fields André Maldonado
  • Re: Multi-valued fields Michael Garski
  • Re: Multi-valued fields Sean Carpenter
  • Re: Multi-valued fields Artem Chereisky
  • Re: Multi-valued fields Artem Chereisky
• 26m documents, 8 fields, Core2 Duo (E6550 2.33GHz), /tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0, 40 requests/second...is that fast or slow? Ron Grabowski
  • Re: 26m documents, 8 fields, Core2 Duo (E6550 2.33GHz), /tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0, 40 requests/second...is that fast or slow? Jokin Cuadrado
  • Re: 26m documents, 8 fields, Core2 Duo (E6550 2.33GHz), /tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0, 40 requests/second...is that fast or slow? Artem Chereisky
  • Re: 26m documents, 8 fields, Core2 Duo (E6550 2.33GHz), /tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0, 40 requests/second...is that fast or slow? Ron Grabowski
  • RE: 26m documents, 8 fields, Core2 Duo (E6550 2.33GHz), /tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0, 40 requests/second...is that fast or slow? Michael Garski
• I want to index mailing addresses...how can I map Ave to Avenue, St to Street, Ct to Court, etc.? Ron Grabowski
  • Re: I want to index mailing addresses...how can I map Ave to Avenue, St to Street, Ct to Court, etc.? Robert Taintor
  • Re: I want to index mailing addresses...how can I map Ave to Avenue, St to Street, Ct to Court, etc.? Ron Grabowski
• Is it generally a good idea to avoid using QueryParser if you know how to make the Query yourself? Ron Grabowski
  • RE: Is it generally a good idea to avoid using QueryParser if you know how to make the Query yourself? Digy
  • Re: Is it generally a good idea to avoid using QueryParser if you know how to make the Query yourself? Ron Grabowski
  • RE: Is it generally a good idea to avoid using QueryParser if you know how to make the Query yourself? Digy
  • Re: Is it generally a good idea to avoid using QueryParser if you know how to make the Query yourself? Erik Hatcher
• Must Field.Index.ANALYZED Fields be searched only by QueryParser/StandardAnalyzer? Ron Grabowski
  • RE: Must Field.Index.ANALYZED Fields be searched only by QueryParser/StandardAnalyzer? Digy
  • Re: Must Field.Index.ANALYZED Fields be searched only by QueryParser/StandardAnalyzer? Ron Grabowski
• Simple question André Maldonado
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • Best way to store book information Eric Advincula
  • RE: Best way to store book information Digy
  • RE: Best way to store book information Eric Advincula
  • RE: Best way to store book information Digy
  • Re: Eric Advincula
  • RE: Digy
  • Excessive IOExceptions in IndexSearcher/QueryParser/FastCharStream? Ron Grabowski
  • Re: Excessive IOExceptions in IndexSearcher/QueryParser/FastCharStream? Ron Grabowski
  • RE: Excessive IOExceptions in IndexSearcher/QueryParser/FastCharStream? Digy
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • Re: Simple question André Maldonado
  • RE: Simple question Franklin Simmons
  • RE: Simple question Digy
  • RE: Simple question Digy
• Boosting Multi-Value Fields Matt Honeycutt
• Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Li Bing
  • RE: Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Digy
  • RE: Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Michael Garski
  • Re: Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Li Bing
  • RE: Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Michael Garski
  • Re: Exceptions When Indexing with Multi-threading Li Bing
• IndexHtml project Error Jim
  • RE: IndexHtml project Error Digy
  • RE: IndexHtml project Error George Aroush
• Monitoring Index Size Jerry Camel
  • Re: Monitoring Index Size Jerry Camel
  • RE: Monitoring Index Size Monteiro, Alvaro
  • RE: Monitoring Index Size Franklin Simmons
  • Re: Monitoring Index Size Jerry Camel
  • RE: Monitoring Index Size Granroth, Neal V.
  • Re: Monitoring Index Size Noel Lysaght
• Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed George Aroush
  • RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed Monteiro, Alvaro
• How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Digy
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
  • Re: How to loop through all the entries for a field digy digy
  • Re: How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Digy
  • RE: How to loop through all the entries for a field Eric Advincula
• FW: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene George Aroush
  • RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene Torsten Rendelmann
  • Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene Tien Do
  • RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene Torsten Rendelmann
• Lucene.Net 2.9.0 status update George Aroush

• Earlier messages