Landmark
Ruling Overturns Sodomy Laws
365Gay.com ,
June 26, 2003
By Paul Johnson, 365Gay.com Newscenter, Washington Bureau
Chief
Washington, D.C.裕he Supreme Court Thursday struck down
laws outlawing sodomy. In a 6?3 decision, the court said that states cannot
make laws regarding the private sexual conduct of Americans.
The ruling said the Texas law violates the Due Process
clause of the Constitution. Writing for the majority Justice Anthony M.
Kennedy called the ban on gay sex an 砥nconstitutional violation of
privacy.?
甜It] demeans the lives of homosexual persons,?
Kennedy wrote.
Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader
Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer agreed with Kennedy in full. Justice Sandra Day
O辰onnor agreed with the outcome of the case but not all of Kennedy痴
rationale.
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin
Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.
典he court has largely signed on to the so-called
homosexual agenda,? Scalia wrote for the three. He took the unusual step of
reading his dissent from the bench.
典he court has taken sides in the culture war,?
Scalia said, adding that he has 渡othing against homosexuals.?
The overturn of the ban on gay sex was hailed by gay
activists. (Reaction To Ruling)
的ts an historic day for all gay Americans? said Ruth
Harlow, a lawyer for Lambda legal which argued the case on behalf of the two
Texas men.
The ruling negates not only the sodomy law in Texas, but
those in a dozen other states. Three states柚issouri, Oklahoma and Kansas
which have laws targeting only gays. Another nine states輸labama, Florida,
Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and
Virginia揺ave sodomy laws that apply to all adults, gay or straight.
The case involve two Houston men, John Lawrence and Tyron
Garner. They pleaded no contest to breaking the sodomy law in 1998, after
police broke into Lawrence痴 home in search of an armed intruder and
discovered the two men engaged in intercourse.
No intruder was found and police later said the tip there
was an intruder came from an anonymous source.
Both men were arrested under the Texas sodomy statute and
imprisoned overnight. Following their conviction they were fined 200ドル each and
ordered to pay court costs.
The convictions bar both men from holding several types
of jobs in Texas. If they move to other states, they could be required to
register as sex offenders.
The men 殿re entitled to respect for their private
lives,? Justice Kennedy wrote in his decision.
典he state cannot demean their existence or control
their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime,? he said.
Today痴 ruling reverses Bowers v. Hardwick where the
Supreme Court 17 years ago ruled 5?4 that a Georgia statute criminalizing
consensual sodomy was constitutional.
[Home] [News] [Lawrence
v. Texas]