Last edited: January 07, 2005


Remember the Past as We Enter a New Gay World

San Francisco Chronicle , July 4, 2003
901 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94103
Fax: 415-896-1107, Email: letters@sfchronicle.com

By Dave Ford

I was riding BART to the Gay Pride Parade on Sunday when I noticed a middle-aged man dandling a younger woman預ll legs and high-heeled sandals熔n his knee. They cooed and necked, and I thought: I don稚 mind what these heterosexuals do in the privacy of their own bedrooms, but flaunting it in public?

Speaking of bedroom privacy, hooray for the 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Lawrence vs. Texas declaring the unconstitutionality of state anti-sodomy laws.

I was almost as delighted by the respectful tenderness of Justice Anthony Kennedy痴 decision as I was amused by the foaming vitriol in Justice Antonin Scalia痴 dissent. (Both contain instructive reading, and can be found庸ree for the nonce容xcerpted at www.nytimes.com/2003/06/27/national/27GTEX.html.)

I知 glad I致e lived long enough to say this, but I never thought I壇 live long enough to see this day. I vividly recall the Gay Pride Parade of 1986, which, like Sunday痴, fell on June 29 and dawned foggy and cool, with patchy sunlight.

The Dykes on Bikes made a hairy racket, and for the next few hours it was a kick to see揺onestly? To see people still standing. AIDS was then despoiling the gay community. The parade had the typically nutty: drag queens, the nude and naughty, bar floats with young guys blinking in the too-bright sun. But it also had new grassroots organizations catering to the AIDS- afflicted: hot lines, support groups, hospices, pet care.

President Ronald Reagan had yet to even utter the word 鄭IDS? five-plus years into his two-term presidency. (He壇 do so the next year.) His successor, father to our current president, would handle AIDS by having his steel-nerved wife hug a baby infected with HIV. (One could argue it gave nongays a way to see AIDS affecting not just junkie homos. Cynics葉here were many of us耀aw it as a 都afe? way for a Republican president to tackle the issue without really tackling the issue.)

Also in 1986, the 鼎hristian? right was having a fund-raising field day linking same-sex love to incest, bestiality, child molestation and, one almost suspected, an unfortunate dependence for self-empowerment on the memory of Judy Garland.

(The wit remains: Scalia, in his dissent, wrote that the majority decision might lead to the quashing of state laws 殿gainst bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity.? Hail Sen. Rick Santorum! It痴 a litany so nice, Scalia repeats it twice, apparently to ensure 鼎hristian? rightists hear him楊ind of culture-war-ish for a guy who elsewhere in his dissent harrumphs that, with this decision, the court has 鍍aken sides in the culture war.?)

So the ?86 Pride Parade was a deeply political moment of togetherness預 ray of white light during dark days.

The next morning the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Bowers vs. Hardwick, voting 5-4 to uphold the constitutionality of state sodomy laws. It thus reaffirmed states? abilities to criminalize gay sex (and certain sexual practices enjoyed by nongays). It was like a hammer smashing to pieces the fragile hope that had evolved from the previous day痴 festivities.

Therefore, to have the Court痴 current iteration overturn Bowers just days before this year痴 parade, and during pride week, felt like more than a bit of a vindication.

That said, once at the parade on Sunday I found myself grinding my teeth over the corporate-sponsored floats, the lion痴 share of them from liquor companies. Most egregious was that of Miller Lite, a multinational beer company which, in a full-page, back-of-the-book ad in the July 8 Advocate, offered the slogan: 展e池e here. We池e beer.?

The reference is to a chant欄We池e here! We池e queer! Get used to it!迫that emboldened disenfranchised early ?90s queers living under the shadow of AIDS, Reagan and societal invisibility. Thus consumerist irony. Irony is anathema to passion; passion sparks change. Change is anathema to continued consumerism.

To be ironic about what was once essential for the progress of gay people預nd to do so in service of a corporate bottom line擁s to denature and disempower that which created change. Keeping people dumb and passive擁n part by assimilating and erasing their history擁s the corporate, not to say the American, way. Fie on those who buy in, gay or nongay.

I talked about this on Sunday to a gay man in his early 30s. He said it got tiresome hearing about how things were better or more activist a decade or so ago. He had missed part of my point葉hings were much worse then傭ut, you know, guilty as charged, Your Honor. Maybe it痴 a sign of creeping codgerism; sometimes I feel like a Vietnam War vet.

But if I ring this bell often, it痴 only because the generation wiped out by AIDS might have been able to pass on a history not covered in schools, where nongay people learn all about their past.

Without a sense of history to ground them, a people are left with little but blind optimism or irony unto cynicism. History has hard lessons, but it offers hope, too. Learning of past oppression isn稚 to glorify oppression. It is to value the possibility of change預nd, when it comes, change itself. Today痴 young queers are standing on the shoulders of giants, just as I did when I was young. I壇 be remiss if I didn稚 note that this year痴 Supreme Court rendering is made sweeter by the harshness of the Bowers decision.

That said, one leans, in darker periods, toward the crotchety. So, plainly put, these are good times for queers. The Supreme Court痴 decision, Canada痴 nod to gay marriage, a domestic partners bill zooming through the California state Senate預ll are hopeful signs. They came about because culture at large has changed, due, in part, both to media exposure of gay diversity and, it must be said, corporate acceptance of the gay marketplace. Culture changed because queers have become visible. Our new chant: 展e池e here! We池e queer! We池e here!?

That will be true for as long as we don稚 forget where we once were. The philosopher George Santayana wrote that 典hose who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.? That sentiment was made clear Sunday, when a float passed boasting a 展izard of Oz? drag queen Dorothy dancing atop it. The ghost of Judy Garland once again graced the gay stage. Odd thing: it made the jaded heart sing.


[Home] [Editorials] [Lawrence v. Texas]

1

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /