We suggest that the PI is not reset upon box entry, but exerts a relatively weak influence on map selection when visual cues are identical in two environments. The primary contribution of the PI is to constrain the nascent place code to a proper 2D manifold, but the discrepancy in PI coordinates in the two boxes does induce some differences, hence partial remapping. Hebbian learning would then cause cells with fields in both boxes to become bound to two sets of path integrator coordinates. The PI thus both causes partial remapping and preserves it. We explore this hypothesis with computer simulations.
In Knierim's (2002) double cue rotation experiment, place code
dissociation, individual place field splitting, and partial remapping
are attributed to weak attractor dynamics. But they also imply a weak
but nonzero PI influence. When some cells appear to follow local
landmarks whle others follow distal, the weak PI may remain bound to the
distal reference frame and compete with local landmarks for control of
place fields.
Support Contributed By: NIH MH59932