«
»

Justifying an addictive game: it’s GEOMETRY!

by

small-pearlOne of my students recently sent me an email with a link to the game Shinju. (Thanks Chris Z!) He included the note, “I thought you would enjoy this game I came across. It deals with Maxi geometry!”

The game is played on an 8×8 board that is partially covered with shells, one of which has a golden pearl inside. You click on a shell, and it either reveals the hidden pearl (You Win!) or it gives a number indicating how many steps away the pearl is, where each step can be horizontal, vertical, or diagonal. It’s fun to play the game, and I found it surprisingly addicting.

For example, in the screen shot below I had clicked on a shell and it indicated that the pearl was 8 steps away:

pearl-game-1

Now here’s where the neat geometry part comes in. Moving in horizontal, vertical, and/or diagonal steps, the number of squares that are 8 units away lie in a giant square around the chosen shell.This isn’t immediately obvious — it took me a while of playing around before I noticed that. And so in the picture below I drew a yellow line through all the unit squares that were exactly 8 steps away. If the board were bigger, or I had’t picked a shell in the corner, then the yellow line would form a square completely around the chosen shelll.

pearl-game-2

For my next try, I just picked a shell that was along that yellow square. It wasn’t the right one, and indeed was 6 steps away from the right one. In the picture below I’ve drawn an orange line through all of the unit squares that are 6 vertical, horizontal, and/or diagonal steps away from the chosen shell. Again, if my board were bigger the orange lines would form a square completely around that second shell.

pearl-game-3

Then I looked at the intersection. It turned out that there was only one space that worked, and fortunately it had a shell in it. That’s what I picked.

pearl-game-4

This method worked in general, although sometimes there was more than one shell that was the appropriate number of steps from both of my first two choices, and I didn’t find it until clicking on the fourth (and final) shell.

It was only after playing this for a while that I realized why Chris had made the reference to Maxi Geometry, which is a geometry that uses Chebyshev (or Tchebyshev) distance. Maxi Geometry is a geometry in which the distance between two points is the maximum of (the difference of the x-values) and (the difference of the y-values). The Chebyshev between the point (-1,3) and the point (2,10) is the maximum of 3 (the difference of the x-values) and 7 (the difference of the y-values), so those points are Chebyshev distance 7 apart. You can define a circle to be the set of points that are a fixed distance from a given point, and it turns out that the circles look like squares. That is, the yellow lines form a Chebychev “circle” around the first shell, and the orange lines form a Chebyshev “circle” around the second shell.

All of which is to say that playing this game could easily count as prepping for teaching Geometry again in the spring.

Like Loading...

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on November 13, 2008 at 7:22 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Justifying an addictive game: it’s GEOMETRY!”

  1. jd2718 Says:
    November 13, 2008 at 8:15 pm | Reply

    Level 50 on my first try. Addictive. And I quit.

  2. Jason Dyer Says:
    November 15, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Reply

    Don’t forget the eyeballing game for some extra practice.

  3. Carnival of Mathematics #44 « Maxwell’s Demon Says:
    November 20, 2008 at 8:20 pm | Reply

    […] the hard work out of the way, so its time for some mathfun. Returning to 360, you can consider a geometric excuse for an addictive game. Gil Kalai presents a couple of very […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply


[フレーム]
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /