| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| From: | Gregg Reynolds <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 3 May 2014 12:44:38 -0500 |
| Message-id: | <CAO40MikJM1KyCan5q2U1hNq1Ab3paQ0t-+-uJKL3n1X=A0zmfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Good morning,
I am looking for (I'm going to call it) 'fundamental concepts' and I am
making the assumption that there is some basic agreed level of
definition of these concepts so we don't end up in Physics and Chemistry.
I am assuming this level is arbitrary and we can agree with it.
My criteria for 'fundamental concept' is that it cannot be replaced by a
semantic net-let that crosses the agreed level.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] English number of words/concepts that cannot be composed of others , Patrick Cassidy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] English number of words/concepts that cannot be composed of others , John F Sowa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] English number of words/concepts that cannot be composed of others , John Bottoms |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] English number of words/concepts that cannot be composed of others , tknorr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |