On 4/24/14 1:19 AM, John F Sowa wrote:
> KI
>> >That's also true...
> I agree with your points, and I'm glad that you agree with me.
>
> But there have been some people who claimed that you need a distinct
> URI for every sense of every word.  (01) 
They are missing the point, since this isn't really possible amongst 
cognitive beings. In short, that's antithetical to the very notion of 
"cognitive being" and "context fluidity".  (02)
All we can do is provide unique identifiers that denote entities in a 
given world view (or situation). IMHO. Ultimately, we can cross 
reference with entities (denoted using other identifiers) in other world 
views as one discovers and comprehends those world views. Basically, as 
our world view expands we discover new insights etc..  (03)
> Unfortunately. no annotators
> (human or computer) can agree on which URIs to assign.  (04) 
Naturally.  (05)
>
> To achieve a 90% agreement among annotators is unusually high.
> That means that a typical page with 300 words would have at least
> 30 errors -- even if you had professional annotators.  (06) 
Yep!
>
> John  (07) 
--  (08)
Regards,  (09)
Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen  (010)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J  (01)