ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy.

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2014年1月17日 11:06:41 -0800
Message-id: <52D97F41.4030206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
As a followup thought, I'd like to share an expectation I've had for the year or so since I joined this list, one unclear can ever materialize. I have no doubt representatives of the National Security community are on this list (rightly and appreciatively so) and, knowing personally about the levels of funding drenching that community for the past dozen years, I wanted to be aware of the 'give back' that community would now provide to open citizenry, its direct investors and clearly its most primary stakeholders. So I want to ask in a general way, what ontologies have been developed by this community, what can be shared, with us? Anything about privacy (asked with no tongue in cheek)?

Even more pointedly is that the National Institute for Standards & Technology should have an inventory of the ontologies (being) developed in-house to all government agencies. Why do I sense this level of information, integration and facilitation, is simply absent from the work here?

This site is beginning to seem a bit like a charade to me. (charade: an absurd pretense intended to create a pleasant or respectable appearance). I'd rather that not be the case for many many reasons. Thanks for any response/jmc


On 1/17/2014 10:21 AM, John McClure wrote:
[You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings.

In addition: For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).
The present situation is like the dawn of telephony -- we're all talking on a party-line, with zero expectation of privacy, now it's time to create an SS7 protocol for the Internet, if you will. In the meantime, I'll leave hardware matters to others who have more sway than the soapbox we have here.

/jmc


 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J  (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy. , Barkmeyer, Edward J
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy. , Osorno, Marcos
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy. , John McClure
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy. , Osorno, Marcos
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /