ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2013年1月22日 18:12:56 +0100
Message-id: <20130122171255.GA24265@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Ed,  (01)
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:51:28AM -0500, Barkmeyer, Edward J wrote:
> At the risk of sounding like an old pedagogue, you might consider reading a 
>Ted Codd paper from about 1980 on the possible interpretations of Null. 
> My recollection is that he identified at least 4 possible interpretations:
> 1) No value is meaningful (the property does not apply to things with 
>whatever other properties are documented)
> Example: a person whose marital status is "single" does not have a value 
>for "spouse"
> 2) No value in this instance (the thing does not have an instance of this 
>property)
> Example: a person may have no value for "mobile phone number" (by not 
>having the service)
> 3) The value should exist but is not known (no one entered this datum)
> Example: a missing "date of birth"
> 4) Whether there is a value is unknown
> And there is a further state that we now sometimes see:
> 5) The value has been redacted. It may be in the database, but it is not 
>in the query result, because the requester does not have the authority to ask 
>for it (in this case).
>
> And there may well be others. "Null" is a Humpty Dumpty word.  (02) 
This Humpty Dumpty word seems to have a lot of use cases. Looks quite useful 
to me (and has been in RDB projects).  (03)
Do current RDBs actually behave differently regarding Null ? Otherwise I would
not see any problem. I don't care a bit about semantics as long as my tool has
a well defined behavior.  (04)
Regards,  (05)
Michael Brunnbauer  (06)
-- 
++ Michael Brunnbauer
++ netEstate GmbH
++ Geisenhausener Stra?e 11a
++ 81379 M?nchen
++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
++ E-Mail brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx
++ http://www.netestate.de/
++
++ Sitz: M?nchen, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B M?nchen)
++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++ Gesch臟tsf?hrer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel  (07) 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J  (08)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook , Edmon Begoli
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] NULLs and 3+1 vs. 4D ontologies (was Re: Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook) , Matthew West
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook , Edmon Begoli
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook , John F Sowa
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /