ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Truth

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthew West" <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2012年7月25日 00:37:18 -0500
Message-id: <A8B6DDF7-D05D-4232-8A81-1EEE37B1E9B7@xxxxxxx>
On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Matthew West wrote:  (01)
> Dear Pat,
> I'm trying to get my head round this stuff.
>
>> And me. And it was then that I asked John about his basic logical
>> construct 'ist', written as
>> 
>> ist(c, p)
>> 
>> and read as meaning " p is true in the context c". The question was, is
>> the 'p' in this formula a sentence or a proposition? It is *written* in
>> the McCarthy/Guha/Makarios context logics as a sentence; but to my
>> delight, John said it was a proposition. Which is exactly what it is in
>> the IKL way of writing this as a logical relation between two things, a
>> context and a proposition:
>
> MW: How is ist different from simple inference? i.e. from
> If c then p.  (02) 
Several ways. First, c is not a sentence, but a context. It might be a time, 
for example, in which case ist(c, p) says that p is true at that time. Or it 
might be a fictional story, eg  (03)
ist(SherlockHolmesStories Inhabits(Dr.Watson 221b_Baker_street) )  (04)
or indeed, it could be a sentence, I guess. But then (this is the second point) 
the relationship between the context (even if it is a sentence) and the 
sentence in that context is not a simple Boolean relationship like ((not c) or 
p). It is probably not a function of their truth-values at all, in fact. It 
would be more like a modal relationship where the c part determines the 
particular modality.  (05)
But just to re-emphasise my point, above, I wasn't trying to get clear about 
the c part, but rather the apparently more obvious part, the p. It turned out 
that this had been miscategorized for over a decade in the development of 
context logics.  (06)
Pat  (07)
> Regards
>
> Matthew West 
> Information Junction
> Tel: +44 1489 880185
> Mobile: +44 750 3385279
> Skype: dr.matthew.west
> matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
> http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>
> This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
> and Wales No. 6632177.
> Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
> Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>
>  (08) 
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes  (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J  (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Truth , Pat Hayes
Next by Date: [ontolog-forum] First Impact Factor for Applied Ontology: 1.105 , nicola guarino
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Truth , John F Sowa
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Truth , John F Sowa
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /