| To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| From: | Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2012年4月08日 11:58:41 -0400 |
| Message-id: | <4F81B5B1.1030802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Dear Kingsley,
You wrote:
This is also why
'Attribution' is something that needs to be fixed across
all value chains. I do
really believe that the Web provides good infrastructure
for this particular
problem since it enables us leverage hyperlinks as both
generic names and data
access addresses. Thus, contributors ultimately end up
with a more versatile
branding and imprint mechanism for their contributions.
Kingsley
Nice idea! But how would “attribution marks” be preserved under such examples as the Gene Ontology, with later rebranders using their own web sites for the references to outside links?
To be clearer, there is no currently safe way for an IP developer to permanently mark her work. With current technology, copyrights and trade secrets, even trademarks can be copied, modified only slightly, and made available under completely different branding without giving any “attribution” to the original site, e.g., GO.
The IP content producing industries have studied how to do this, and come up with such things as water marks, but nothing so far has been able to protect any form of IP from casual deconstruction. Witness the Blue Ray drive; dongles; encrypted software; songs; movies; books; … . So far, nothing can stop the repatriazation of IP in any form. If there is a way, you should certainly patent it. Protection like that could be worth a great deal of money.
But I think it is unlikely that IP can be protected by any technological approach. If so, the only way “attribution” can be preserved is willingly, through consent of the rebrander. For that to happen, there must be some self interest to both the rebrander, for providing attribution, and some self interest for the IP owner, for cooperating with the rebranders’ links.
Google, for example, pries value from rebranding web sites and advertisers in ways that are responsive to the self interest of searchers. So google gets revenues through rebranding; advertisers pay money to google to get ads shown; web site owners invest in SEO to make their sites more widely accessible, and the whole thing is an economic dance of self interest by each and every class of players.
Do you have any thoughts you’re willing to share on how “attribution” can be made attractive to ontology rebranders, i.e., in their own self interest? The GO example is a very good one; how would rebranders satisfy self interests by rebranding GO knowledge?
If there are such, how can the solutions be reproduced for other ontology web sites, in other economy scales? Is there a general solution to the problem, or is self interest too much of an art at this stage in technology? Could a self interest ontology be created to record the solution(s)?
Curiously,
-Rich
Sincerely,
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
From:
ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kingsley Idehen
Sent:
Saturday, April 07, 2012
1:22 PM
To:
ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re:
On 4/7/12
2:09 PM,
You wrote
Show me an innovator and I'll unravel a person that's had to solve a really frustrating personal problem that became a product. The much celebrated Steve Jobs is a prominent example, and of course there are many others :-)
Nicely exemplified. Other examples are the classically celebrated inventors such as Thomas Edison (who actually just funded developments to reach goals he set for the actual problem solving engineers he hired), Nicolai Tesla (one of his engineers), Alex Graham Bell (who built on the shoulders of EM theorists), and Henry Ford (who solved the practical problems of economical construction of cars). They were all individuals, who organized other individuals and accepted the others’ contributions as their own. Work for hire laws distort whose intellectual contributions were actually recognized and rewarded financially.
This is also why 'Attribution' is something that needs
to be
fixed across all value chains. I do really believe that
the Web provides good
infrastructure for this particular problem since it
enables us leverage
hyperlinks as both generic names and data access
addresses. Thus, contributors
ultimately end up with a more versatile branding and
imprint mechanism for
their contributions.
Kingsley
-Rich
Sincerely,
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kingsley
Idehen
Sent:
Saturday, April 07, 2012
9:49 AM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re:
On
4/7/12 12:20 PM,
The point of the article, as I see it, is that individuals following self interest are the originators of knowledge, sharers of knowledge, and the source of social progress. Grouping people into political units (such as religious movements, democracies, socialist states, dictatorships, pick your favorite or most reviled instance) is what turns the groups ultimately toward the dark side.
Great point!
Some use the moniker 'Game Theory' for what your excerpt
above.
Show me an innovator and I'll unravel a person that's
had to solve a really
frustrating personal problem that became a product. The
much celebrated Steve
Jobs is a prominent example, and of course there are a
many others :-)
My passion for data access was the product of
frustrations I had eons ago,
while working as an accountant. I couldn't understand
why Lotus 123 and other
productivity tools didn't have seamless hooks into
back-end relational
databases :-)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology , John F Sowa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology , Kingsley Idehen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology , Rich Cooper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology , John F Sowa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |