Ed,  (01)
I completely agree with everything you said about terminology. I
realize the value of good terminologies, and I wasn't criticizing
any of that work.  (02)
EB
> Remember first that the audience for that work is people who write
> domain vocabularies, standards of practice and other semi-formal
> publications. The objective is to explain to such persons how to select
> terms, and conceive and write definitions that will be clear and
> understandable to other people who have some training in the subject domain.  (03) 
The point I wanted to make is that the overwhelming majority of
the so-called OWL ontologies on the web are *terminologies*.
Their definitions are stated as OWL comments, and they don't
use any of the reasoning methods designed for OWL.  (04)
John  (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J  (06)