To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 2011年2月09日 12:13:15 -0500 |
Message-id: | <4D52CB2B.1050608@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
On 2/9/2011 3:36 AM, Gian Piero Zarri wrote: > With respect to the use of temporal constraints during the unification > process, you can see also the Sections "NKRL, Timestamps and Intervals" > (pages 80-86) and "Temporal Information and Indexing" (pages 194-201) of > my 2009 book (http://www.springer.com/computer/ai/book/978-1-84800-077-3). (01) NKRL looks very interesting, and from what I've seen, it seems that the logic of NKRL might be systematically translated to the IKL extensions to Common Logic. (02) Have you looked into the issue of translating NKRL to IKL? In the IKRIS project, Lenat & Co. agreed that IKL was sufficiently expressive to support all of Cyc. (03) John (04) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah) , John F. Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah) , Gian Piero Zarri |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah) , Gian Piero Zarri |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah) , Gian Piero Zarri |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |