ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology of Rough Sets

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年1月25日 02:25:46 -0600
Message-id: <EF5BD86A-24BE-4361-9855-1E574FA74A25@xxxxxxx>
On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:10 AM, Matthew West wrote:  (01)
> Dear Pat,
>
> This could be misinterpreted.
>
>>> A 4D object, in this context, is an object that can have different
>>> state at different times.
>> 
>> No, that is a continuant. In a very strict 4D model, there is no single
>> 'thing' that has the various states. (Although I hasten to add, it is very
>> convenient to be somewhat less strict than this. I mean only to make the
>> conceptual distinction.)
>
> MW: As you know, there are two versions of 4D, one of which, stage theory,
> only admits timeslices with infinitesimal temporal thickness called stages
> which can be strung together, the other, perdurantism, allows objects to be
> extended in time as well as space, and that one spatio-temporal extent can
> be a part of another.  (02) 
Yes. Stage theory is the 'very strict' version I was referring to.  (03)
> 
> MW: The ambiguity comes from "there is no single 'thing' that has the
> various states".
>
> MW: This is true if one is talking about stage theory - there are only the
> various stages. However, it is not true for perdurantism, provided one
> interprets "has" as meaning "has temporal parts".  (04) 
But I still think that this is a misleading way to express the intuition. In 
4-D perdurantism, there really is nothing that has different *states*. An 
enduring object which retains its identity through time and whose properties 
change with time is a continuant, and continuants are incoherent in a 4-D 
universe. Put another way, a temporal part is not a state.  (05)
But I am no doubt splitting hairs at this point.  (06)
Pat  (07)
> 
> Regards
>
> Matthew West 
> Information Junction
> Tel: +44 560 302 3685
> Mobile: +44 750 3385279
> Skype: dr.matthew.west
> matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
> http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>
> This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
> and Wales No. 6632177.
> Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
> Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>  (08) 
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes  (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology of Rough Sets , David Leal
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] CL and Mutual Interpretability , Pat Hayes
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology of Rough Sets , David Leal
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology of Rough Sets , Matthew West
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /