To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 2010年8月29日 03:08:26 -0500 |
Message-id: | <41ADC021-B5B6-40AF-B761-AC98C7FCF41E@xxxxxxxx> |
On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Pavithra wrote: > ...After all semantics is about reasoning. (01) No, it isn't. Semantics is about meaning, more exactly (though still roughly), the connection between symbols and their interpretations. This is of course not to say that semantics is unrelated to reasoning -- an appropriate semantic theory for a language will provide notions of *logical truth* and *entailment* that can be used to justify the axioms and inference rules that constitute an actual reasoning system. (02) Chris Menzel (03) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Enterprise Architecture - Example ofBed vs Cell and reasoning! , FERENC KOVACS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Enterprise Architecture - Example ofBed vs Cell and reasoning! , FERENC KOVACS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Enterprise Architecture - Example of Bed vs Cell and reasoning! , Pavithra |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Semantic Enterprise Architecture , Maikel Leyva |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |