Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

ontolog-forum

Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

from [Duane Nickull] [Permanent Link][Original]

To:	"edbark@xxxxxxxx" <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From:	Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	2009年3月19日 14:33:53 -0700
Message-id:	<C5E80851.38F5%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>

Ed:
On 3/19/09 2:23 PM, "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

(a) most of the lock-in technology is added features that the standard
doesn't specify at all; and

Have you ever tried to write one CSS file and see it works across all browsers? It is a frustrating and difficult job. I saw something very funny on this the other day and submitted it to SlashDot. It made the front page:

"Microsoft is tracking incompatible Web sites for its upcoming Internet Explorer 8 browser and has posted a list that now contains about 2,400 names — including Microsoft.com. Apparently, even though Microsoft's IE8 team is doing the 'right' thing by finally making IE more standards-compliant, they are risking 'breaking the Web' because the vast majority of Web sites are still written to work correctly with previous, non-standards-compliant versions of IE."

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/19/2056228

D

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (01)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics, (continued) Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Randall R Schulz Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Richard H. McCullough Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Azamat Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , John F. Sowa Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Richard H. McCullough Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Duane Nickull Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Richard H. McCullough Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Adrian Walker Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , John F. Sowa Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Ed Barkmeyer Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics, Duane Nickull <= Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Ed Barkmeyer Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Richard H. McCullough [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Joel Bender Re: [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Ed Barkmeyer Re: [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Joel Bender Re: [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Ed Barkmeyer Re: [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Joel Bender Re: [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Ed Barkmeyer Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , John F. Sowa Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Richard H. McCullough

Previous by Date:	Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Ed Barkmeyer
Next by Date:	[ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units , Joel Bender
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Ed Barkmeyer
Next by Thread:	Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics , Ed Barkmeyer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]