ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] a skill of definition - "river"

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009年2月18日 10:19:20 -0500
Message-id: <499C26F8.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Frank,  (01)
Almost none of the concepts that anybody has learned spring
into existence fully formed at a precise point in time.
They grow and change throughout a lifetime.  (02)
FK> But you can tell the date of the concept that you have
 > created in your mind to identify that hut in Your head.  (03) 
Absolutely not. The example of a log cabin is one that I
had used before, but each time I use it, it evolves.  (04)
In my previous note, I imagined a builder who had no idea
of building a log cabin. He just laid a few logs next
to a tree to make a temporary shelter. The idea of a
shelter gradually evolved into the idea of a log cabin.
That is typical of all our ideas.  (05)
FK> I do not understand this obsession with syllogisms and
 > reasoning based on syllogisms in order to do, for instance,
 > machine translation based on statistical data.  (06) 
I certainly agree. A well-trained carpenter or an engineer
in any field has a very large toolkit and many different
skills. They use a hammer for one task, a saw for another,
and a drill for something else. To build intelligent systems,
you need to know many different aspects of intelligence and
have a very large collection of tools and skills.  (07)
FK> And to make an ontology learnable to must forget about
 > formal logic.  (08) 
You need different tools and techniques for different purposes.  (09)
FK> Instead, we should be seeking procedural knowledge that
 > shows how you arrive at a concept and how you can act, not
 > just glare at the ideas the frozen into "maps" that show
 > non existing pints in 2D connected by a straight line
 > indicating nothing, but a hazy association.  (010) 
Procedural methods are very important for many kinds of tasks.
They are an essential part of any knowledge engineer's toolkit.  (011)
As I said, I've covered these issues many times before. Please
read the papers before making any assumptions about what I am
proposing. You can start with the "Challenge of Knowledge Soup":  (012)
 http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/challenge.pdf  (013)
For an outline about how to integrate and use a wide variety
of different kinds of tools and techniques, see "Architectures
for Intelligent Systems":  (014)
 http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/arch.htm  (015)
For psychological issues, see "Categorization in Cognitive
Computer Science":  (016)
 http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/cogcat.htm  (017)
Following is a more recent talk about three applications that
use the VivoMind technology:  (018)
 http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/pursue.pdf  (019)
The last slide of that talk (and other talks in that directory)
has pointers to other papers for further reading.  (020)
John  (021)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (022)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologies for Debate? , Anders W.Tell
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] a skill of definition - "river" , FERENC KOVACS
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] a skill of definition - "river" , FERENC KOVACS
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] a skill of definition - "river" , FERENC KOVACS
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /