Addendum:  (01)
I wrote most of the ebXML technical architecture and worked on several of
the specs. I also was on the steering committee. I also was CTO of one of
the handful of companies that implemented some of the specifications. I
argued that if it didn't technically work, no one would be able to implement
it and it makes the other arguments moot.  (02)
What I said below is factual.  (03)
Duane  (04)
On 1/14/08 11:32 AM, "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:  (05)
> Duane Nickull wrote:
>> One of the primary reasons ebXML failed was because the business process
>> component ignored the technical architecture and delivered something else.
>> The whole could not function without that critical part.
>
> I don't know what this means, but I am reasonably sure I would disagree.  (06) 
-- 
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
**********************************************************************  (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (08)