ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit

To: cory-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年12月22日 12:40:14 -0500
Message-id: <476D4BFE.5000406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Agreed. Sounds like some good exercises below. Any suggestions on good 
languages for writing translations ? I am considering Haskell and oCaml 
and trying to phase out XSLT.  (01)
Cory, I thought you'd appreciate John's suggestions below regarding UML 
-> CL translations. I look back fondly on the many debates in our 
conference room regarding just this subject !  (02)
John: Happy Holidays to you and your family. Say hi to Arun.  (03)
And Happy Holidays to everyone here on the Ontolog Forum !  (04)
John F. Sowa wrote:
> Rick,
>
> I think that would be very useful:
>
> > At the summit, I'd like to see this scenario generalized
> > into information flow and IFF.
>
> But IFF is a theoretical tool that is still under development,
> and the theories, no matter how elegant, won't be accepted
> until people develop mission-critical applications.
>
> Common Logic is something that practitioners can begin using
> today. Although I encourage projects like IFF for the long term,
> there are many short-term projects that can be implemented now:
>
> 1. Adapt the RDF and OWL tools to generate Common Logic as
> a notation for internal processing. The CL notation is
> more compact and efficient for high-performance processing
> of large volumes of data.
>
> 2. Write translators from UML and SQL to Common Logic.
> That would facilitate the integration of both with the
> Semantic Web tools as well as the huge numbers of working
> systems that were designed in UML and use relational
> databases.
> 3. Write translators from KIF, CycL, and rule-based languages
> to CL in order to promote interoperability between the
> various knowledge-base systems, the Semantic Web, and
> current enterprise-level systems.
>
> No research is necessary for these implementations. Any
> decent comp. sci. graduate could write the translators
> during the holiday vacation, and some have already been
> written. However, code developed at universities has to
> be made bullet proof for industrial-strength applications.
>
> > Any chance Robert Kent would attend ?
>
> I don't know. Send him a note and ask him.  (05) 
Will do !  (06)
> John
>
>
>  (07) 
-- 
Thanks Rick,
blog http://spout.rickmurphy.org
web http://www.rickmurphy.org
cell 703-201-9129  (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (09)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit , John F. Sowa
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit , John F. Sowa
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit , John F. Sowa
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit , John F. Sowa
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /