ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is th

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年12月12日 10:40:29 -0800
Message-id: <200712121040.29257.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 10:29, Pat Hayes wrote:
> > ...
>
> Apparently the point of my comment about QT has
> not quite got through. There is only one actual
> scientific theory of quantum theory (actually
> quantum electrodynamics, aka QED).  (01) 
You have to include quantum chromodynamics (the counterpart of QED that 
describes nuclear matter, including quarks and gluons and other 
bosons), too, right?  (02)
The current term for all of quantum theory is now the "Standard Model."  (03)
> ...
>
> Pat  (04) 
Randall Schulz  (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (06)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Pat Hayes
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Pat Hayes
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Pat Hayes
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Pat Hayes
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /