To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:31:17 -0600 |
Message-id: | <C4C79DE2-1B0A-44E6-A101-4B3C99C71CA2@xxxxxxxx> |
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:59 AM, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation > > In this account, there is no 'collapse', so its a hard stretch to > posit that consciousness causes or results from it. > > luckily we can all have our favourite choice of science to justify > our views of the world (01) So, let's see, we have our worldview and then we choose the science that fits. Great! I choose Young Earth Creationism. Man, that was easy! (02) -chris (03) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , paola . dimaio |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Wacek Kusnierczyk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , paola . dimaio |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Wacek Kusnierczyk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |