ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is th

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:31:17 -0600
Message-id: <C4C79DE2-1B0A-44E6-A101-4B3C99C71CA2@xxxxxxxx>
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:59 AM, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation
>
> In this account, there is no 'collapse', so its a hard stretch to
> posit that consciousness causes or results from it.
>
> luckily we can all have our favourite choice of science to justify 
> our views of the world  (01) 
So, let's see, we have our worldview and then we choose the science 
that fits. Great! I choose Young Earth Creationism. Man, that was 
easy!  (02)
-chris  (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (04)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , paola . dimaio
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Wacek Kusnierczyk
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , paola . dimaio
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?) , Wacek Kusnierczyk
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /