Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> This conversation is going on too long. There is little to be gained by 
> citing decorative text at us that we wrote, in an attempt to refute our 
> position. At most, you will get us to admit that we may have made a poor 
> choice of words. The ISO spec is quite tightly written, and I think its 
> meaning is abundantly clear.
>  (01) 
I've learned a lot here. Many thanks to you and Chris for the time 
you've taken to help me better understand. What I get here on the 
ontolog forum by exploring issues like this with experts like you and 
Chris is an education money can't buy !  (02)
> Pat
>  (03) 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (04)