ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Neuro-ontology, Onto-neurology, and the Semantic Web

To: John Black <JohnBlack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年8月07日 08:32:47 -0700
Message-id: <C2DDDEAF.52E5%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
John:  (01)
(inline)  (02)
On 8/7/07 6:34 AM, "John Black" <JohnBlack@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But he doesn't stop
> there, he also claims that progress in getting machines to due similar
> tasks has been severely hampered by the erroneous belief that algorithms and
> calculation could somehow reproduce the functionality of the cortex.  (03) 
DN: I totally agree with this. This is the basic point I was trying to
make. I hadn't realized someone else had already gone there. I find a lot
of ontology work related to the notion that defining logic is the first step
of a process to replicate the human existence inside an application,
bestowing cognitive, precognitive and learning capabilities to a pile of
code. A pile of code still seems to miss something (perhaps intuition of
precognitive capabilities?).  (04)
When analyzing the real world, I find the preposition of access to all truth
and knowledge in totality, then filtering out the applicable statements at
time of need, suboptimal. As a former world class athlete (downhill
mountain bike racing), instinct was much more important in a race than
thinking. You simply do not have time to calculate in some instances
therefore the whole model of calculations to solve a problem becomes moot.
Sure some of it happens subconsciously (my motto used to be jump first,
figure out the landing later). This lead to a few accidents including
several concussions which may explain my interest in computational studies
;-)  (05)
> I think this is relevant to ontology and logic both when it comes to the
> ability to choose and interpret symbols to use to identify the things about
> which the ontology and logic are about.  (06) 
DN: Again find myself in agreement but this is a rather abstract statement
and hence hard to find fault with. I would assert that there seems to be an
aspect that transcends ontology and computational intelligence as we know it
but I find thinking about how you think is actually one of the hardest
activities. Even separating emotions from identity is difficult.  (07)
This sort of becomes a quasi philosophical discussion akin to existentialism
( Kierkegaard and Nietzsche et al).  (08)
Duane 
-- 
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
MAX 2007 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/07/adobe-max-2007.html
**********************************************************************  (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Neuro-ontology, Onto-neurology, and the Semantic Web (was: Current Semantic Web Layer Cake) , Pat Hayes
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Neuro-ontology, Onto-neurology, and the Semantic Web (was: Current Semantic Web Layer Cake) , Duane Nickull
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Neuro-ontology, Onto-neurology, and the Semantic Web (was: Current Semantic Web Layer Cake) , Pat Hayes
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Current Semantic Web Layer Cake , Danny Ayers
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /