ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Mike Brenner <mikeb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年1月20日 14:12:37 -0500
Message-id: <45B269A5.3060002@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Deb,  (01)
I agree that eventually ontologies will
better describe pictures; however, the next step
in the evolution of semantics involves developing
tools with the ability to denote/connote phrases,
within given domains/contexts.  (02)
Mike Brenner  (03)
Deborah MacPherson wrote:
> Why does it have to be a word? Why cant it be a drawing instead? An 
> unlabeled map, or labels of ontology specific words could turn on and off.
>
> By drawing I mean the full extent of one universal view governed by one 
> ontology. Another area, another ontology, a different drawing.  (04) 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept , Deborah MacPherson
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept , Mike Brenner
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept , Deborah MacPherson
Next by Thread: [ontolog-forum] Top posting , Christopher Menzel
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /