Hi Peter,
> (c) I am only familiar with the former, and I
believe it has a
> maximum of 5 parties (in the conference call) only
> ... that's why I would really like to find out more (available,
> limitations, costs, ... etc.) if one could do better than that.
You are right, but things change so
we should watch this space.
What I was thinking, depending on how
many would plan to call, was:
1) Use Skype conferencing---if calling
audience is limited
OR
2) Use my Skype account to call my conference
call number (SkypeOut) and distribute that number to the interested participants.
I can handle unlimited (well maybe too strong of a word :) but I
can handle many callers and it has a free 866 number, at least for those
in the US and a worldwide toll number
Open to other suggestions, assuming
we have a > 4 audience on the phone. I may also have to check
with the conference organizers to make sure I would not be violating any
prior agreement or rules for the conference...
Take care,
E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose, CA USA
maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
Homepage: http://maximilien.org
ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/17/2005
08:33:04 AM:
> Max,
>
> This is great! =ppy
>
> [OT] Just out of curiosity, when you say "we could setup a Skype
> conference line" ...
>
> (a) is that something you've been doing regularly?
>
> (b) would this be a normal "free" skype call, or would this
be
> using some other Skype premium service?
>
> (c) I am only familiar with the former, and I believe it has a
> maximum of 5 parties (in the conference call) only
>
> ... that's why I would really like to find out more (available,
> limitations, costs, ... etc.) if one could do better than that.
>
> Thanks in advance. =ppy
> --
>
>
> Michael Maximilien wrote 2005年11月16日 22:32:23 -0800:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Building on the successful ontolog-forum SWS panel =>
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2005_10_20.
> >
> > The organizers of the Dynamic Web Process (DWP) 2005 workshop
have asked
> > me if we could organize a follow-on SWS panel during the workshop
at
> > ICSOC 2005 => http://www.icsoc.org/
> >
> > This could be a great opportunity to meet in person, renew and
further
> > the discussions we have started, and help strengthen our collective
> > efforts to give some directions and flesh out important research
issues
> > and questions for the SWS community (both academia and industry).
> >
> > Ideally, as for the ontolog-forum presentation, we would have
> > representation for each of the major SWS initiative. I
have WSDL-S
> > confirmed, OWL-S confirmed, and partial commitment from WSMO,
as well as
> > pending invitations for SWSF/FLOWS.
> >
> > Of course, I realize that the timing is short, and with limited
funding,
> > travel can be a serious issue. So I am asking the presenters
(and some
> > colleagues) if they could participate in this panel in Amsterdam
in
> > December 12th?
> >
> > I plan to summarize and share the results of the panel with the
> > ontolog-forum community. Also, I was thinking that we could
setup a
> > Skype conference line for those who are not able to attend but
would be
> > willing to call in (time is TBD for now).... just an idea
at this point
> > but if interested please contact me directly.
> >
> > If you are willing to participate OR have suggestions then please
feel
> > free to contact me also.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
> > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > San Jose, CA USA
> > maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Homepage: http://maximilien.org
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.
> net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>