ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Semantics

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年5月02日 15:56:22 -0700
Message-id: <4276B016.9060506@xxxxxxxxx>
Adrian:  (01)
Thank you for this feedback. I had a thought strike me whilst reading. 
Please forgive the naive nature of this question.  (02)
Is it true that a formal ontology is a circular reference pattern, 
albeit a very indirect, complicated and very large one? Does any 
definition assume the knowledge of other axioms in a model, that 
themselves may be dependent upon the definition one is trying to clarify?  (03)
This is probably a newbie question answered in Ontology 101.  (04)
Duane  (05)
-- 
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - 
http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********  (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Semantics , Internet Business Logic
Next by Date: [ontolog-forum] Re: Semantics , Internet Business Logic
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Semantics , Internet Business Logic
Next by Thread: [ontolog-forum] Re: Semantics , Internet Business Logic
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /