Adam Pease wrote:  (01)
> Folks,
> I've posted a new version of the CCTrep.kif file, and mappings from 
> SUMO to the CCT, linked at the top of the page 
> <http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation>. Comment 
> welcome.
>
> Adam  (02) 
mm1: Adam, in reviewing this I see good work but wonder about the 
associations / assumptions that have been made [1]. For example:  (03)
 * Code. Type: SymbolicString - This is not about brevity. It is
 about a consistent mechanism to type information in order to
 provide a baseline for representation. May need further review.
 * DateTime: time - Insufficient to provide a date because many
 applications use the date time for deadlines - not 24 hours, but
 21-Jan-2005.
 * Measure Unit. Code: ConstantQuantity - You have to drill down to
 understand the semantic association [2].
 * Agency: Agent - An agency is not an individual but a grouping
 mechanism for an authority (that may be comprised of people). [2]  (04)
Thanks.  (05)
[1] I've only copied you as I've not had time to follow this in any detail.
[2] I have some hesitation to say some of these associations of natural 
language and CCT fit. My concern lies in that 0...n CCT may be 
associated with this natural language and you lose the specificity of 
that typing mechanism in that association. Perhaps you can provide more 
details so I understand the reasoning better.  (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (07)