ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] [CCT-Rep] UBL whitepaper on Code vs Identifier & CCT

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Stitzer <Alan.Stitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 2004年3月12日 09:59:09 -0800
Message-id: <4051FA6D.8050509@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Tim.  (01)
1. I've uploaded that to our file workspace, and that document -- 
"Code vs Identifier - The Definitive Paper" by Sue Probert and Mike 
Adcock -- is now accessible as: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/reference/UBL-ebXML/UBL-LCSC_Code-Identifier-Definitive_20020624.doc  (02)
2. Thanks for extracting the pertinent sections of the Core Component 
Technical Spec (CCTS) to show us at the conference call yesterday. One 
small issue, I noticed that the extract you were using was an excerpt 
from CCTS v2.0 dated 2003年08月11日. If I understand it correctly (please 
correct me if I am wrong, anyone - Mark or Alan?), the latest version 
of the CCTS is v2.01 dated 2003年11月15日. I did check, and all the 
pertinent material we were referencing at the call were identical in 
both documents (there are some differences in section "10 References" 
though.) Your extract is equivalent to pages 95-113 of the CCTS v2.01.  (03)
I suggest that, whoever is going to work on the modeling, formalizing 
or ontological engineering of the CCT's to please make reference and 
cite from the latest version (i.e. v2.01, unless we hear otherwise) 
only. I have remarked on our meeting wiki page too (see: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11_CCT#nid053).  (04)
Regards,
PPY
--  (05)
Tim McGrath wrote 2004年3月12日 14:36:20 +0800:  (06)
> sorry petetr i think the online reference disappeared when OASIS 
> upgraded their software.
>
> here is the source document...  (07) 
> Peter Yim wrote 2004年3月11日 20:05:03 -0800:
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> During our 2004年03月11日 CCT-Representation call, when discussing UBL's 
>> delineation between "Code" and "Identifier", you were refering us to 
>> an earlier UBL whitepaper (ref: 
>> 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11_CCT#nid063). 
>>
>>
>> I can see a couple of codelist related papers at the UBL-NDR site, but 
>> I don't think you were referring to them. Can you provide a link to 
>> the paper which you feel is pertinent to our task at hand, please.
>>
>> Thanks. -ppy
>> --  (08) 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: 
>> mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (09) 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [ontolog-forum] [CCT-Rep] UBL whitepaper on Code vs Identifie r , Robert . Miller
Next by Date: [ontolog-forum] [CCT-Rep] An Ontological Basis for ebXML Core Component Types [was - Re: Modeling/formalizing representation of CCTs] , Peter Yim
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] [CCT-Rep] UBL whitepaper on Code vs Identifier , Tim McGrath
Next by Thread: RE: [ontolog-forum] [CCT-Rep] UBL whitepaper on Code vs Identifie r , Robert . Miller
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /