Peter,
 One correction, at least as I understand what the consensus was  (01)
# further discussion/debate pertaining to whether LineItemID? needs to be 
captured in the ontology was made (062)  (02)
 * Adam sees this as being an implementation issue (063)
* the group agreed to capture it in the ontology anyway (will someone 
please summarize the arguments on the discussion fforum, please)  (03)
I believe the consensus was that implementation issues such as ID numbers, 
would be captured in separate documents that relate the structure of a 
legacy model to the ontology and vice versa.  (04)
Adam  (05)
At 11:54 AM 7/31/2003 -0700, Peter P. Yim wrote:
>Great call today.
>
>Meeting proceedings are now available at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Conference_Call_2003年07月31日
>
>We'll focus on trying to thrash out the choice of representation and tools 
>issues over the next week or so.
>
>Regards,
>PPY
>--
>
>Kurt Conrad wrote 2003年7月31日 09:57:05 -0700:
>>* Meeting Details
>> Date: Thursday, July 31, 2003
>> Start Time: 10:30 am PDT / 1:30 EDT
>> End Time: 11:30 am PDT (reserved to 11:55 am PDT)
>> ...[snip]...
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: 
>mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (06) 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (07)