ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: MDaconta@xxxxxxx
Date: 2003年7月10日 16:35:09 EDT
Message-id: <17b.1d095162.2c3f27fd@xxxxxxx>
In a message dated 7/10/2003 1:05:00 PM US Mountain Standard Time, golsen@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Your definition, "An invoice is a document which is part of a financial transaction between two or more parties and is a response to an order." is good as far as it goes. But this definition could also represent a "pay-on-receipt ship notice". I would suggest the definition be opened up to include the following: "An invoice is a document which is part of a financial transaction between two or more parties requiring either the payment of monies or the granting of a credit and is a response to an order."


Hi Greg,

I like the refinement of the definition. The distinction is important.

On the issue of SUMO, I found text, under artifact, under CorpuscularObject.
The corpuscular part threw me ... I thought it was referring to corpuscles in
biology and not the more general diminutive of corpus. Ahhh.... the joys of
esoteric definition ;^)

- Mike
---------------------------------------------------
Michael C. Daconta
Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc.
www.daconta.net
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO , Duane Nickull
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO , Duane Nickull
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO , Duane Nickull
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO , MDaconta
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /