In message <AAF7796B-984B-4C49-A3F3-BE111166196E at randomchaos.com>, Scott Reynen <scott at randomchaos.com> writes >But is it actually being published widely enough to be considered an >established standard we can model? We can't determine that from one or >two examples. Per the process, please document a wide variety of such >examples How many is a sufficiently "wide variety"? The 'process' doesn't give any indication. -- Andy Mabbett <http://www.pigsonthewing.org.uk/uFsig/> Welcome to the world's longest week!