[uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

Thu Mar 23 09:53:34 PST 2006

On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Chris Casciano wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Robert Bachmann wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>> Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link
>> aren't covered by hAtom 0.1.
>> So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our own 
>> extraction
>> methods, which I'll outline with some pseudo-code.
>>>> As I posed in IRC yesterday -- is it really up to the stylesheet / 
> authors of consumers to determine this stuff? Almost definitely 
> this should become part of the spec/wiki and consensus reached -- 
> both for the benefit of tool authors -- but also the benefit of 
> page builders like myself who are trying to reconcile differences 
> between hAtom and the Atom spec and wondering how they work together..

Yes, I think it *should* be. They were left out of 0.1 for the sake 
of getting something out the door.
-rk