I guess my question is: what's wrong with the way it works now? :DG< On 6/22/06, Sam Sethi <sam.sethi at vecosys.com> wrote: > Hi Remi >> My take on it is this - Tantek and others started this idea but as it grows > up (its 1 years old) it should be handed over to some standards body. > Tantek due to his commercial connection with Technorati - IMHO - should > divest ownership of Microformats.org to the W3C or some other body. My only > concern is that this may kill the speed and agility of MF's just as they > gain traction. >> Sam >> -----Original Message----- > From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org > [mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Rémi > Prévost > Sent: 22 June 2006 00:33 > To: Microformats Discuss > Subject: [uf-discuss] Very basic question that is not in the FAQ >> Hi guys, >> Yesterday, I posted a post on my blog explaining the basics of microformats > but I got a question from a reader that is not answered in the wiki FAQ, > although I think it is a very good one. The question is: >> "Are microformats approved by anyone else that their creators and the ones > who user them? Who is in charge of them?" >> I mean, I know they're all open formats, but I was still wondering if > there's an organization that is in charge of the microformats. >> For example, the W3C is in charge of the development of several standards, > but who is in charge of the development of microformats. Is microformats > community the only one that is in charge of them? >> Thank you, >> P.S. - Sorry for my bad english. >> -- > Rémi Prévost > remi at exomel.com > http://remiprevost.com | http://exomel.com > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss at microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss >> _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss at microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss >