[uf-discuss] hReview feedback

Fri Jan 13 01:20:26 PST 2006

On Jan 12, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
> "Scott Reynen" wrote...
>> Paul Bryson wrote:
>>> On the topic of hReview, I think it works really well with one
>>> exception.
>>> The "Rating" system seems woefully inadequete. I guess 1-5 is a 
>>> common
>>> case, but certainly not 80%. There should be a machine readable 
>>> way to
>>> mark
>>> the upper and lower bounds of the rating.
>>>> There is.
>>>> "The rating is an integer from 1 to 5 inclusive indicating a 
>> rating for
>> the item, higher indicating a better rating. Optionally a different
>> integral "worst" value and/or "best" value MAY be specified (e.g. 
>> 6 from
>> 0-10)."
>> To clarify, there should be a better way. Specifically, a better 
> way to
> mark the lower bound. I can't think that I've ever seen a review 
> that tells
> you if the lower bound is 1 or 0. So, how do you provide that 
> information
> without looking silly?

How do people provide it now without looking silly? Do they?
> The currently used date-pattern allows the entire date/time including
> timezone to be provided, all without overwhelming the reader. I 
> would like
> to see a similar method.

Of course, we're using a specific, standardized time format here, so 
there are different concerns.
-rk
--
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com