[LOGic] Problem with FR-J
R Johnson
k1vu at tmlp.com
Mon Nov 10 18:06:40 EST 2008
At 09:29 11/10/2008, you wrote:
>Here's why this is a bad idea:
Why is removing ",TO" from the prefix list a bad idea ???
It was a partial prefix that was effecting every "TO" call.
If it had been a full call sign their wouldn't have been a problem.
>FR
>Reunion
>Nov 25 - Dec 6
>RW3RN, UA4HOX, RA3AUU will be in the contest as TO3R
>RW3RN
>>This comes from 425 DX news. Better to add the individual calls to
>prefix table.
I routinely do this. I have already added TO3R to FR.
Just hope I get to work them :-) !!!
TNX es 73
Bob, K1VU
>73 Doug W5GA
>>-----Original Message-----
>From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>[mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of R Johnson
>Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 8:52 PM
>To: logic at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: [LOGic] Problem with FR-J
>>Hi:
>While tracking down a DXCC discrepancy between LOGic and Lotw I
>discovered
>an error in the "Prefix Table".
>>When comparing the confirmed lists of countries (LOGic and Lotw) I found
>FR-J
>was the extra DXCC entity in LOGic and was listed as "Juan de Nova &
>Europa Island".
>>Further checking showed every callsign starting with "TO" was listed as
>FR-J.
>>When I looked at the prefix listed for FR-J I found "FR-J,FR4FA,TO".
>>I deleted the ",TO" and did a reindex & pack.
>>Now if you enter any "TO" call in on the "INFO" window it now works
>correctly.
>>Now all I have to do is look up all those TO#* calls are actually
>located.
>>73
>Bob, K1VU
>>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
More information about the LOGic
mailing list