[Logic] Latest version of Logic???

2003年7月08日 18:02:28 -0500

At 02:55 PM 7/8/2003, you wrote:
>Hi All,
>>Have you chaps tried to call and talk with Dennis directly on this subject?
>Or even send him an e-mail.

I have, and he usually responds quickly.
>I have NEVER had my e-mails go "unanswered" and I have been a LOGic user
>since the early DOS days.

Nor have I.
>If you chaps want to have something included in a future update of the
>program, contact Dennis directly and if it is possible it will be done,
>sooner or later, quite often sooner.

I can't agree here. Dennis is the first and last god on what happens to 
Logic. that is his right though.
I don't mean to say he does not listen and perhaps get some ideas from the 
group but he has to like it or it does not happen.
>If he is reticent about adding software update version numbers on his FTP
>site, he obviously has a very good reason for it. Ask him and he will let
>you know his reasons.

He has been asked and he has not responded to this. I don't know why. I 
think there is a block in his mid on this one. Oh well, better this than 
actual program trouble.
He has obviously seen this discussion, and could respond if he wished. The 
main probable reason ,in my opinion, is that he does not want to do it but 
has no reasonable explanation of why he should not. I am ready and willing 
to listen to a reasonable logical explanation.
>73, Carl VE9OV
>>>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bob Johnson" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:05 PM
>Subject: Re: [Logic] Latest version of Logic???
>>> > Hi:
> > This is one of my pet peeves with LOGic also. It makes no sense to
> > me either. I can't see that it would do any harm and it would sure
> > makes things easier for the user to know where he is version wise.
> >
> > As far as the "Only case of poor customer relations", there are many
> > where the questions and inquiries are just go ignored, no reply at all.
> >
> > 73
> > Bob, K1VU
> >
> > At 07:56 AM 07/08/03 , you wrote:
> > >At 06:23 AM 7/8/2003, you wrote:
> > >>Tough? you bet. I just can't understand why the version number isn't
>part of
> > >>the filename.
> > >>
> > >>This is so very typical in the CAD software industry. As part of my job,
> > >>I'm responsible to ensure latest versions including patches are
>downloaded
> > >
> > >This has been requested over and over but totally ignored by the author.
>I
> > >don't understand it either but we just have to live with it. Apparently
>he
> > >is for some unfathomable reason strictly opposed to doing it. He does not
> > >say way, just totally ignores it. This is the only case of poor customer
> > >relations I can point to with logic, very strange?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >LOGic mailing list
> > >[email protected]
> >
> ><http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic>http://mailman.qth.net/mail
> > man/listinfo/logic
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LOGic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> >
>>>>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic