[Logic] QSL LABELS
K0DAN
[email protected]
2002年1月13日 21:47:00 -0600
Jamie...
I was inquiring as to which label but have been told 5160's (and 8160's? Not
sure how they differ) work. Am now trying to figure out the subtleties and
procedures to make it all idiot proof.
I had made a custom photo QSL but feel it is quite complex and will be too
costly in ink and card stock...at least to have a photo QSL. That's why I'm
trying the label approach right now!
73
Dan
K0DAN
----- Original Message -----
From: "James C. Hall, M.D." <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 14:15
Subject: RE: [Logic] QSL LABELS
> Hi Dan:
>> Yes, it uses standard Avery sizes. I use that particular label format
along
> with some of W7NN's hamstuff and it works great.
>> Jamie
> WB4YDL
>>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of K0DAN
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Logic] QSL LABELS
>>> Hello Group...
>> Still experimenting with switching my QSL process to use LOGIC to generate
> QSO (and maybe address) labels.
>> I think I like the "QSL LABELS WITH ADDRESS, 3-ACROSS .REP" but can anyone
> tell me if this uses a standard (e.g. Avery) label, size, etc.?
>> Any other label or procedure suggestions before I go too far down this
road?
>> Thanks and 73
>> Dan
> K0DAN
>> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>>> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>