Re: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?
From: Ryan Starrett <pyryanggg@...>
Date: 2022年8月13日 22:23:06 -0400

Typo in title, os.remove & os.rename.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:22 PM Ryan Starrett <pyryanggg@gmail.com> wrote:

This confused me. The only reason I could think would be that their behavior is very platform dependent, but that's also true for IO functions. Why are these functions in OS instead of IO?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?, Lorenzo Donati

References:
- Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?, Ryan Starrett

Prev by Date: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?
Next by Date: Re: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?
Previous by thread: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?
Next by thread: Re: Why are os.remove and os.remove in the OS library instead of the IO library?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread