On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:08 AM, pocomane wrote:
> All we need is USER-DEFINABLE TABLE LENGTH
Pratically, are you proposing a new {...#} contructor that is just
syntactic sugar for:
It seems that you are focused on red herring (new constructor syntax) and overlooked main idea:
I suggest #t to become LHS-_expression_.
Actually, that's all.
And as optional addition, a convenient syntactic sugar
t = { ... #}
may be introduced for
t = { ... }
#t = select( '#', ... )
But even without this new constructor syntax my suggestion would be helpful.
The [...] constructor can be used instead