Re: LUA_INIT can replace require
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LUA_INIT can replace require
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:44:13 -0300
On 02/03/17 12:22 PM, Charles Heywood wrote:
Literally nothing? I'm confused by this thread. If you don't want to
use something, then *don't*.
It's called a rhetorical question, and you can read about them here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:21 AM Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com
<mailto:fakedme@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 02/03/17 12:07 PM, 彭 书呆 wrote:
> 在 2017年3月2日 21:21, Tony Papadimitriou 写道:
>> -----Original Message----- From: 彭 书呆
>>
>>> maybe we can add a command line switch to disable environment
variable processing?
>> You mean like the -E switch since Lua v5.2?
>>
>>
> well, in my post I mean finer control over environment
variables, e.g. I might want to skip the
> processing of LUA_INIT but keep LUA_PATH/LUA_CPATH.
>
> but I think the -E switch can be enough for most cases. How come
I totally never know it before.
>
>
If you're gonna use the -E switch, what stops you from using the -e
"package.path = 'stuff here' .. package.path" switch?
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time,
with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.
--
--
Ryan <vandor2012@gmail.com <mailto:vandor2012@gmail.com>>
Software Developer / System Administrator
https://hashbang.sh
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.