Am 26.02.2017 um 16:36 schröbte szbnwer@gmail.com:
hi all!
Hi!
The LuaRocks.org site imported the labels from LuaToolbox.org. So we do have labels (just on the site, not on the CLI). Iterative refinement of label selections would be a nice addition, but I more desperately miss a sorting by endorsement like in the old Toolbox because I usually filter the modules by satisfied (well-known) users first before I look for the functionality that I need. This way I can get rid of the 90% crap that Steve talked about. We *could* add labels to the rockspec so that the CLI can use them, but we would need a way to make the rockspec authors agree on a common set of labels. I'd suggest to give the rockspec authors complete freedom to choose labels, and maintain equivalence sets and a blacklist separately.what if instead of trees, just using simple labels, and then one can check for a label, and if getting too much resoultz, then choose a next one, and this way forward...
Philipp