Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser.
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 08:20:07 -0300
> I would actually be interested in trying to see if I can use the
> `ltokenp` library to actually create this kind of scope limitation
> without the parser change, although for my specific case I prefer
> having the compile time error (although maybe `ltokenp` could do that too?).
Any kind of non-local syntactic analysis with ltokenp (beyond counting
matching braces as in assert.lua) is bound to be complicated, but
perhaps keeping track of scopes and names is not too bad.
- References:
- Declared UpValues, change to Parser., Duane Leslie
- Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser., Duane Leslie
- Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser., Duane Leslie
- Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser., Duane Leslie
- Re: Declared UpValues, change to Parser., Duane Leslie